An exclamation mark(what’s a screamer?)
An exclamation mark(what’s a screamer?)
Massive LOL that there are 3 million selfies of She Here and this is the one she chooses. Awks
I bet they are. Is there a way to find out?I wonder are they all on the books of the same agency
They usually broker it behind the scenes and set up a whatsappI bet they are. Is there a way to find out?
There's no doubt now she's pulled out all the stops on her path to being a full-time influencer. Bon appetit
Behold. A “feminist”. Choosing to not wear an item of clothing because her thighs may look slightly bigger in it… instead of just wearing what the hell she wants to wear.What an utter prick she is…
View attachment 1052713
What possible reason to post, unless she wants a few ‘Noooo!! You’re so tiny!!’ messages? Who would even consider white jeans in February anyway? She’s so contrived and needy.
because she just lurrrrrves advicehow grim is that?
her influencer management company have likely advised her that if she is purchasing followers she needs to try and boost engagement so it doesn’t look so obvious. Her way to boost engagement is this obvious - whip smart our Sal
I only searched far enough to find her literary agent, she represents a LOT of people, some we shouldn’t be surprised to see that they share an agent…I wonder are they all on the books of the same agency
I'm guessing, if not tomo, soon could be packaging innovations such as the EL crem and Trinny's new cleansers with refillable pumpsCan't wait to see what kind of column she's phoned in this week![]()
I'm guessing, if not tomo, soon could be packaging innovations such as the EL crem and Trinny's new cleansers with refillable pumps![]()
Ah OK - she must've said that as well. On the Liz Earle podcast LE was saying how there should not be anonymity and Sali agreed with her. (This was when she then went on to say she had a list of 20 names 'most of them in regulated jobs', one of whom 'worked for an adoption agency'. Which sort of entirely disproved her theory that posters here are thick with no lives).I'm sure she's said that she doesn't think banning anonymous accounts is the answer and would prefer sites to be legally responsible for their content in the way newspapers are. Can't remember where she's said it though.
I don’t even follow Sali closely and this post was SO jarring to me. So clearly written by someone else.Latest grid post. Isn't this a good way to get more followers for yourself?View attachment 1056045
You are so right.Behold. A “feminist”. Choosing to not wear an item of clothing because her thighs may look slightly bigger in it… instead of just wearing what the hell she wants to wear.
You’re a disgrace to womanhood, Wali.