Tell us more , always tell us more
Tell us more , always tell us moreJoining here after seeing the instarant. I was a complete little Colin sheep but unfollowed SH on insta a few months back when it became sooooo obvious she'd had surgery and botox and was lying about it. She was also really rude to me on the GTL page more than once.
Go to CH thread, it’s all there in its’ glory.O
Oh wow, thanks Victoria for the explaination, i've been wanting to know what all this is about for ages. This actually makes me want to buy DE products now! CH is a self important, condecending, vindictive arsehole. Glad someone sees through her.
You win the internet today!! Bravo! Very well articulatedWow, what drama. Had to re-sign up again just to add my support. From the accusations made by Sali, she is basically twisting the narrative rather than accept others have differing opinions about her Bestie CT, and her own misleading content. Have people accused CT of being a poor employer, yes. Have people felt misled in Sali's product recommendations due to her "tweakments" and undisclosed ads, partnerships etc, well yes. The only time people have mentioned her children, is to question why Sali is putting them on social media. The only time people have mentioned Carey, is to question why Sali thinks it appropriate to exploit her deceased friend's privacy and link it into brands like Chanel. The only time people have brought up her partner, is to question why she thinks bringing up what good a "shag" he is is professional and mature.
No one has "harassed" Sali, as far as I know, we are all just making product discussion and impartiality discussion that otherwise would have been made on the Guardian, if it were not heavily moderated. Whereas, according to this thread. Sali et al have bullied others on different forums if they disagree on product, made threats to posters, and searched through their profiles online. Neverminding the abuse she has given to Lauren Luke, Esther and Dawn. Along with the repeated use of homophobic and mental health slurs.
Crying like that in reaction to this thread just manipulation, as she has not addressed any of the comments and is instead wrongly accusing others of things she has done herself. It should be a time for humility and growth. To take onboard fellow women's negative experiences of the beauty industry, and address that her coloumn has turned into just a list of ad's.
If anyone has spoken about her personal life, it has been because she has published it online. Does she forget how she has bullied other women via social media, gone after for no real reason Owen Jones and Susan Sarandon, not made her forum a safe space for discussion, spoken about her childhood and career progression and used this as a means to qualify her opinions?
Her column is a throwback, she doesn't disclose that the products mentioned are "gifted", whereas a blogger or instagrammer would have to. She takes on freebies like haircuts etc like any other influencer that has little to do with her journalism. And her coloumn offers no reak eductation or empowerment. It's just shilling. Look at how Violette fr and co talk about makeup and wellbeing, it's fun, it's workable and transferable to differing price points. Look at how Nadine Baggott is so open about getting "tweakments", and presents this in a professional down to earth manner rather than masking it all. Influencers actually show products, they don't just give a list of plugs, plus a headshot that has nothing to do with what has been advertised, they demonstrate and offer a range of positive or more critical opinions. Shower cap gate, she could have included a pic of it being worn, test it out in comparison to those at cheaper price points, address that even for a re-usable it is shockingly expensive... but nothing, all that was taken from that was the manufacturer came into the comments to sook up to others "we named it after you!" and bash competitors, along with basically showing it was an AD rather than an organic decision from Sali.
That is what is concerning, people still think Sali is just recommending products she has "loved for years" and is not just the same as any other influencer who is plugging the latest launch. People in the comments think she is a professor of beauty & skincare, bit like caroline, and will buy thinking her opinion is qualified, when in reality, what do we actually learn from the column? Her use of "cruelty free" and ethics "boils my piss", as she never clarifies that a product has certain certifications, is owned by so and so unethical parent company, contains animal ingredients, is tested on animals etc.Considering it is also her column, there is no clear ethical slant either, which highlights that it's just a mish mash of ads (how can one promote L'oreal!).
Sorry for this long post, I'm sorry for others who have spoken on here who have been or felt intimated, that is not justifiable, and all over daring to have differing opinions on product!
This rings a ghastly curt bellAnd there was another one! I remember asking about the hair dye thing (as she has said she was allergic to all hairdye, I was going through a bad allergy phase and was scared to dye my hair) she replied "it's simple, don't dye". I don't think that she wasn't dyeing, I mean I am sure she has grey hairs!
Yes I definitely saw it all the time, hot and cold! I'm not upset because I didn't get personal treatment or anything, was just surprised. Why respond if its to snip?This rings a ghastly curt bell.... Certain folk got her La Snipparachi personality flung at them like a bucket of #presstreatment dank piss, others get fawning care packages and offers to do your wedding makeup
It’s a pejorative term used for people who deliberately stir things up. It can literally be applied to people who don’t have a clear identity and ask awkward questions but that is a wilful misrepresentation of the term. It’s usually people who come in and ruin the conversation for everyone.What is the definition of trolling btw? Is it asking genuine questions or sharing real experience in a non inflammatory way? I thought it was when you faked an identity and said deliberately horrible things?
Thanks that's kind of what I thought. It's weird how that is a crime right? I get that calling names or accusing sometime of lying etc might be but that's not what trolling is I think. The world is so confusing! I don't follow her any more and will avoid. Have also deleted any influencers from my SM.It’s a pejorative term used for people who deliberately stir things up. It can literally be applied to people who don’t have a clear identity and ask awkward questions but that is a wilful misrepresentation of the term. It’s usually people who come in and ruin the conversation for everyone.
So asking a question related to the topic which others may have wondered, or making an interesting point which counters the original, are not really troll actions.
She deactivated her own account but I knew it was something to do with Mumsnet, I'm afraid KK can't blamed on this oneNo, MOD deactivated her account herself after she got ripped to shreds over slagging Kim Kardashian off. It wasn’t suspended by IG.
In a Mumsnet thread called Influencer ethics on Instagram, the 33-year-old mum of four was accused of using her @mother_of_daughters Instagram account to post 'ethically dubious' pictures of her children for advertising, reports The Telegraph.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?