I’m so going into this years annual review and screaming Troll If my boss says anything bad.So they want to broadcast their fabulous lives full of gifts and sell to us little people (not leprechauns) all very publicly but wish for any critique to be done in private
I think a gotcha moment in this documentary will be a solicitor (that they've paid to give a view to fit the narrative) say that this site *might be* harassment as Sali knows about it. However another solicitor could equally say that's a load of rubbish as these people live their life courting publicity and it's inevitable people will have opinions.
Change the dragging website to accountability website and it takes on a very different meaning. Out of all of the public figures on social media, only a hanful have as many threads as Sali because it's not people "attacking" someone for no reason. These few accounts are the ones that are pretty shady online.
Heaven help this people if they lived in the real world and had to have an annual review.
The laws that need to be introduced are to protect people from the insidious nature of these influencers. Deep down they probably know they're in the wrong, but have gone down the path for so long they've no choice but to double down and blame the critics.
This puts it so well imotrolling is not saying something about someone that they personally find unpalatable
Sadly I don't think we ever had a chance of the BBC doing a balanced, unbiased and fair documentary.Maybe I'm naive, but I'm disappointed at the BBC's lack of integrity and professionalism.
I was hoping that researchers might have found our wiki and been enlightened.
It just feels so UNFAIR for things to be so MISREPRESENTED!Sadly I don't think we ever had the chance of the BBC doing a balanced, unbiased and fair documentary.
That organisation is full of self serving blue tickers who would circle round to look out for one of their own. I bet they decided on the agenda and narrative to pursue right from the start without doing any basic investigation.
Imagine the fallout if the documentary wasn't stroking Sali's ego and telling her how right she is; Lauren Laverne and Richard Osmand would be fumin'.
If it was what she claims it is I'd never post here.I don’t normally post on these threads but I read her article and had some thoughts.
The irony is Sali has claimed this site is full of lies and misrepresentations, all while her article is full of misrepresentations of what is said here.
She’s trying to create a narrative about this site that simply isn’t true, and is using her mainstream media platform to facilitate that.
You just have to look at some of the responses under her tweets on the matter to see that many are taking what she has written / said at face value, and think this is a “vile place”.
I remember seeing a tweet after her video last year that said something like “imagine finding out a friend or colleague posted on that site”, and it really made me think about the way this site is portrayed in the mainstream and how it should almost be a dirty secret to post here - I think that’s a shame.
Je suis becky!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?