so he just "delegated" ( is that an English word?) to a company , he paid to film his kids instead of filming them himself?Key letters here highlighted “I” and “I’ve” self centred prick. This isn’t about E2 as we all know. This complete tosser is just in it for himself and what he wants. He’s unbearable.View attachment 1273085
“I really wanted a third party involved” First of all, why? You said not even three months ago to a radio presenter on a well known radio station with hundreds to thousands of listeners that your child’s story “wasn’t yours to tell” Well, why do YOU want a third party to film this story? Why isn’t your child involved in making this decision? Oh yeah they can’t consent. None of your children can. Keep going Jonathan and the only thing you will be paying for with this money from exploiting your children is the huge therapy bill.
when he took the vlogs off first of course i thought he was finally sensible but i quickly realised he was jsut planning the newt move.
The company he hired probably asked for footage of Edie from the past, from her "name changing"....etc so he took the vlogs off and placed the footage in the docmunetary instead...he hopes , just like his book it will create engagement and views...