You can't possibly classify a 6year old boy like this. I don't think he is feminine at all. I hate that people want to classify kids sexuality so young. I think he's masculine and I actually think that's their problem. He's the only real male in the house. I think he's going to grow up looking masculine. Jonathan is not masculine. You can't classify Andy this young either.This is how I feel about the boys in dresses. E-2 is a lovely child and he loves to dress up. He loves shoes, hair, and dolls. He is very feminine in his movements and I think that he could be LBGTQ. He was born that way and at his age would rebel if he didn't like it. He is fully aware of what he does because he doesn't want to wear it during his zoom sessions for school, and that's sad. I love that kid, he's amazing and I watch because I want to see him grow. As for Andy, well, he is just going with the flow, but you can tell he isn't going for the dresses, or barbie the way E-2 did. John-boy is just doing the tik toks for views and knows if he puts them in outfits or situations that aren't the norm, he will get views. The twits might be a lot of things, but I do not agree that they force dresses on E-2, or having a sister has made him the way he is. He was born that way, and there is nothing wrong with that.
If you ask almost any transgender person, gay, lesbian, etc.. they will tell you from an early age, even as young as three that they knew. I do not believe they are pushing a narrative on him. I think his embracement comes from the backlash that his classmates would unleash on him if he wore his cute outfit. Of course, we want him to grow up and make his own decisions about his sexuality, but I do not believe they are forcing it on him. Are there times they haven't handled things correctly, yes, but overall I think they've done a decent job. Some Dads would flat out not let their child wear a dress and that does more damage.
Can't kids just be kids without foisting some sexuality label on them. They are most definitely pushing a narrative on him as they are afraid of his masculinity and they seek to undermine it. Any way when since did wearing a dress define anyone's sexuality ! Thank God he had the good sense not to wear the dress for his school lesson - he should be left alone not have all these sexualities thrust upon him. I definitely get the vibe they just want to be trendy and have a boy in a dress.
Anyone who loved their kids would take the channel down because their kids are being discussed and photographed and analysed,
As for people who say its 'sad' he won't wear a dress for school lessons get real ! It's no big hardship is it not to wear a dress. He's aboy and needs to dress like a boy until he decides what he is !
Last edited: