FolderDuvet
Well-known member
No no, just I travel from Oxford to London fairly often (was there last weekend with my bf, saw rubes on the high street while I was wandering about actually) and I know that you don't get the train to or from Marylebone if you can avoid it, because it's slow, uncomfortable, and that station has bad transport links in London.That's incredibly niche knowledge! You're not a trainspotter, are you?![]()
---
Ok you beat me there! I never use the Bakerloo.this is so off topic but Marylebone does have an underground station but it's only the bakerloo line!! Paddington has a direct train to kings cross via the circle and Hammersmith & city lines which would explain the change in service too
---
I still think the trip to Paris was hastily arranged because for someone who claims that she is organised and plans things out everything she did still felt very rushed. I mean she seemed to spend more time in coffee shops and bookshops rather than deciding to visit famous Paris landmarks and when she did visit them i.e. the Louvre she didn't get to see all the paintings that she wanted to.
I read an interesting article in the New Yorker recently about this sort of landmark grabbing tourism, and I question the value of it as a practice. The gist of it was that the sort of tourism for that is going to a touristy place and doing touristy things because you're a tourist isn't really any sort of grandiose personal development task. Like, if you never engage with art back home, what is the point of going to the Louvre to see art? You don't have the skillset to pick it apart and appreciate it, and it isn't going to change you in any fundamental way to see it. You're probably not going to be more interested in art when you get home. If I go to Dubai and go to a falconry centre because it was suggested to me on TripAdvisor, what is the point? It doesn't develop you, it just gives you something to brag about having done. The argument of the article was that when you travel, you should travel with purpose other than being able to say to people that you've been there and done these things. If you're an artist, seeing the art in the Louvre in person makes sense.
Edited Addition: it does seem like a slightly hastily organised trip though, you are right.
Last edited: