Quickly chiming in here as a full-time lurker of this sub who never posts but this irked me so much! I'm an ESL teacher and I just tell my students that "affect" is for an action. A and a. It's a much simpler way of remembering. She lost me with the articles (or "prepositions") rule.Not sure if you're talking about this tiktok? But it just came up on my fyp and I need to talk about this!
Am I crazy or are "the" and "a" articles, not prepositions? And both "effect" and "affect" can be nouns and verbs, can they not? Granted, affect is much more common as a verb and effect much more common as a noun but to act as though it's some hard-and-fast rule seems very reductive? And her explanation of how to figure out whether it's a noun is whether it has 'the' or 'a' before it?? As if there are not instances where you'd use effect as a noun and not have "the" or "a" immediately preceding it? I'm sorry I'm so annoyed at this, I usually only lurk on this thread occasionally because I really don't follow Ruby anymore but this came up and I just had to mention it somewhere because not only is this video patronizing, it's also plain wrong.
On a more advanced level, affect as a noun is used in psychology when talking about emotions or moods, while effect as a verb is also really rare; most people won't ever need to use these variations.
Ruby has a troubling tendency to present things as hard facts when they certainly aren't. When this comes to language it's a problem, because a lot of her followers claim they use her videos to practise English. As we know, we have so many exceptions to the rules in English grammar - Ruby in particular should not be trying to teach it.
Let's hope this isn't the start of "Grammar with Granger"!