You can add comments to books you're not funding, this is a screenshot from the updates page of a book I'm not funding (I contributed to "One in Five" and sent the publisher some feedback just before Christmas suggesting the book was handed over to the professionals for editing so it iactually gets published and the contributors get paid).How and why would Mason Grace be able to comment on a zine they're not supporting? I see one can "sign in to join the conversation", but I didn't sign in using google or whatever to test that I could comment wherever I like.
Mason, if you're there, come join us!
The money is paid to Unbound. I think the author gets a small advance, but the majority of the costs go on the costs of making the book happen (editing, typesetting, printing, marketing, etc). I would imagine any advance is paid contingent on hitting certain targets, such as reaching the crowdfunding target, submitting the manuscript, etc.I’m not 100% sure how these crowdfunding type books work. So am I right in thinking she’s already had the money or is it payable to her on publication? I know about JM’s Kickstarter. Is this a similar situation? How do people even find out how to do this? It just seems like some online racket that people are mindlessly signing up for. I just don’t get it. Not to say everyone doing this is a scam artist but I’d wager a bet that more often than not, they are!
But simultaneously, people must apply for a refund within a specific pretty short time after an announcement of "no book will be published". After that, it's a credit to the giver. So long delays on book production mean givers may take their eye off the timeline, and lose their cash. Unbound and Louisa win. All the good faith is on the giversThe money is paid to Unbound. I think the author gets a small advance, but the majority of the costs go on the costs of making the book happen (editing, typesetting, printing, marketing, etc). I would imagine any advance is paid contingent on hitting certain targets, such as reaching the crowdfunding target, submitting the manuscript, etc.
If the book isn't published, the crowdfunders get their money back so I can't see Unbound being too generous with the advances.
Those scooters are not designed to carry two people, and the small wheels mean that if they hit a pothole there's more likely to be an accident. Dropping your toddler in the road is not going to end well for anyone. The extra weight also means they're slower and less manoeuvrable, and the toddler isn't secured properly like they would be in a child seat on a bike.Well she called that one wrong and isn’t happy with the replies. I’ve seen people doing this. It’s horrifying View attachment 1918900
There’s no joy in this country….Louisa that’s coz you sucked it all out with your awful personality.Those scooters are not designed to carry two people, and the small wheels mean that if they hit a pothole there's more likely to be an accident. Dropping your toddler in the road is not going to end well for anyone. The extra weight also means they're slower and less manoeuvrable, and the toddler isn't secured properly like they would be in a child seat on a bike.
It also looks to be a privately owned one, which are illegal on the public highway. The only ones which are currently legal for use on the roads (and it's the roads, not the pavements) are the ones you can hire as part of a public hire scheme.There’s no joy in this country….Louisa that’s coz you sucked it all out with your awful personality.
1 person per scooter, must be an adult. That’s it. It’s a vehicle.
They are also illegal, and you can be banned from driving for riding one illegally.Those scooters are not designed to carry two people, and the small wheels mean that if they hit a pothole there's more likely to be an accident. Dropping your toddler in the road is not going to end well for anyone. The extra weight also means they're slower and less manoeuvrable, and the toddler isn't secured properly like they would be in a child seat on a bike.
Yes, there's a conversation to be had about whether this is an appropriate use of police time, and how we encourage active travel, and how we can improve road safety for people, and the place of e-scooters as part of active travel, but at the moment the scooters are illegal, she was using it outside of the manufacturer's recommendations, and the police had received a report of a crime being committed. Imagine if they'd done nothing and the next thing is "toddler dies after fall from e-scooter," and whoever reported the mother went to the press and said "I reported that to the police and they did nothing and now a child has died."Fancy the police trying to prevent the serious injury/death of a child then tweeting about it to inform and educate others. Evil.
Yes, there's a conversation to be had about whether this is an appropriate use of police time, and how we encourage active travel, and how we can improve road safety for people, and the place of e-scooters as part of active travel, but at the moment the scooters are illegal, she was using it outside of the manufacturer's recommendations, and the police had received a report of a crime being committed. Imagine if they'd done nothing and the next thing is "toddler dies after fall from e-scooter," and whoever reported the mother went to the press and said "I reported that to the police and they did nothing and now a child has died."
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?