A few insta worthy pics then home.. not for the boys benefit, gotta score those insta mum points. Those poor boysI agree, looking at the stories they really didn’t stay at the actual zoo long at all.
A few insta worthy pics then home.. not for the boys benefit, gotta score those insta mum points. Those poor boysI agree, looking at the stories they really didn’t stay at the actual zoo long at all.
Prob bought itThat pastry thing actually looks edible and dare I say it.. nice first time EVER
Agreed! Common as they come, cant wait to see her downfall as well when insta ban MLM scammersProb bought it
Imagine two mingers together in Blackpool, that bloody Steph is one common horrible skank.
Wouldn't be surprised if she bought it and as usual pretending it's her own work. We all know she likes to take credit for other people's ideas/workThat pastry thing actually looks edible and dare I say it.. nice first time EVER
She would have filmed herself like her usual crappy pancake recipes.No way has she made her own pastry!
We would have had the run down of every ounce of flour etc used....
Stop kidding yourself you scammer
I hope she was patch tested !A couple of thoughts...
1. She says they had an ice cream 'BY the sea' not one pic or mention of the boys in the sand digging or making castles or jumping the waves for a few minutes. Mine would have been more excited about the beach than the zoo. Were the poor things even allowed on the beach or just onto the promenade to get a picture of the beach that she could add instagrams bleeping disgusting Lo-Fi filter to?
2. Eye brows are a terrible shape and for someone who dyes her hair dark constantly the use of henna should be avoided because it can cause severe reactions with the ingredients in dark dye.
3. Funny the ring has arrived back on her finger the moment she starts flashing the cash.... Maybe it was pawned ...jk, definitely looks resized
You're spot on.She’s had the ring reset so it looks (well it doesn’t, but it’s what she’s aiming for) like one big diamond instead of what she actually has, which is a smallish centre diamond with even smaller diamonds surrounding it!
So she’s basically had the smaller diamonds moved closer to the middle main one so there’s virtually no gap (there clearly was before even on a crappy far away photo), creating an illusion of a big (ish) diamond.
Also the shank is a different shape (more on trend), it now tapers in towards the diamonds and was straight before.
I think also (although not sure about this one) that she’s had the height of the diamond setting increased
I.e so the diamond and it’s setting sits taller off her hand, again creating the illusion of a ‘bigger’ diamond.
Yet more money spent trying to create/keep up the farcical illusion her and rat boy have money!
Begs - we know you don’t! Not sure who you think you are fooling more at point, yourself or your sheep!
My husband and I work hard and earn a lot of money. We don’t flaunt it, but at the core of what we choose to spend our money on (important things like beds!, sofas, outside furniture, tiles for our extension etc etc) it’s good quality and will last.
It’s not tit that’s throwaway like every.single.thing you seem to buy whether it be a paddling pool or a cheap pub bench for the garden! (Nothing wrong with either btw!)
But as someone with ‘a very good income’ I wouldn’t be wasting my money or time on most of the tat she buys, and nor would she if she had a pot to piss in!
I thought it looked different!She’s had the ring reset so it looks (well it doesn’t, but it’s what she’s aiming for) like one big diamond instead of what she actually has, which is a smallish centre diamond with even smaller diamonds surrounding it!
So she’s basically had the smaller diamonds moved closer to the middle main one so there’s virtually no gap (there clearly was before even on a crappy far away photo), creating an illusion of a big (ish) diamond.
Also the shank is a different shape (more on trend), it now tapers in towards the diamonds and was straight before.
I think also (although not sure about this one) that she’s had the height of the diamond setting increased
I.e so the diamond and it’s setting sits taller off her hand, again creating the illusion of a ‘bigger’ diamond.
Yet more money spent trying to create/keep up the farcical illusion her and rat boy have money!
Begs - we know you don’t! Not sure who you think you are fooling more at point, yourself or your sheep!
My husband and I work hard and earn a lot of money. We don’t flaunt it, but at the core of what we choose to spend our money on (important things like beds!, sofas, outside furniture, tiles for our extension etc etc) it’s good quality and will last.
It’s not tit that’s throwaway like every.single.thing you seem to buy whether it be a paddling pool or a cheap pub bench for the garden! (Nothing wrong with either btw!)
But as someone with ‘a very good income’ I wouldn’t be wasting my money or time on most of the tat she buys, and nor would she if she had a pot to piss in!