There was a second email from someone confirming that the accusations of the daughter being covered in feces were untrue.
However, I maintain my view that children donât just get removed from families without very good reason. Rarely for one single isolated incident, either. Thereâs a lot that Reann isnât sharing. As is her right, of course. But cherry-picking parts of the story that make her look favourable and others look like the enmy doesnât do her credibility much good
I think that second email was worded in such a way by that particular professional that they had never witnessed A being neglected
personally themself, not that it hadnât happened or been seen by someone else.
The one that claims she was sitting in soiled pants without a change of clothes I think Reann actually defended as something like, âItâs not usually a problem so they donât carry sparesâ.
Thereâs definitely more to it than she lets on. I would not be at all surprised if the professional consensus was that this high needs girl having 9 younger siblings (some of whom also have additional needs) was contributing to the sliding in the standard of care her parents could realistically provide for her. I bet you any money Reann is doing the olâ narcissistic-rewriting-history thing rather than facing up to the fact sheâs made some terrible decisions, sheâs a
tit and self-centred parent, and her kid was removed from her care with good reason.
Youâre so right about the disregard for their dignity. A is nearly 18 years old, and her mother is sharing private documents publicly about her soiling herself. I donât know many 17 year old young women who would appreciate that.