Liar 
PTWM #90 Trauma obsessed, advert fest, PayPal money scandal has still never been addressed
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I had a nosy at those 2 accounts she met with yesterday. They do seem to do stuff with their kids so I think the friendships will be short lived when they realise what a crap parent she is. They surely must see the difference in development between W and their babies (who appear to be actual lockdown babies). Rach must be able to see it too 
"Miss you"? Half the time you don't even notice he's not there Raq, and when he is you're having a go at him over nothing or slagging him off to your phone in your tit attic bedroom.Liar
I thought so given that L had white trousers on when she got got soaked on the water ride.
Some of them are super savvy about their industry connections, others will tag anyone in that has a bigger following. I think if I was reliant on income from my Instagram, I’d need a full financial disclosure from Rachael before I tagged her in. It’s a little bit risky business wise because she’s not transparent. I’d have to ask
Long time lurker but had to come on to reiterate the “lockdown baby?” comments… W is nearly 2 isn’t he, and born 7/8 months before the first lockdown?!
In terms of W’s delayed development, I am taken aback by the lack of support he is receiving from his parents. It could be a case of things going on “behind the scenes” but I find this hard to believe as everything they do is plastered across Instagram.
This only leads me to think that R must be embarrassed, ashamed or in denial about W’s development. My son is 3 and his delayed development was picked up at his 2 year check, and by his very supportive nursery that he has been attending 3 times a week since he was just under one. He does speech therapy which we do privately as the NHS waiting list was so long due to covid. He’s also been referred to be assessed for possible autism. We are doing everything that we can to help and support him because THAT IS WHAT PARENTS DO RACH.
I find R’s apparent lack of awareness nothing short of shocking and surely this constitutes as neglect (maybe I’m wrong?). Hopefully W will have his 2 year check soon and things will be picked up. But if they checks are still being done over the phone due to covid, assume R will just tell them everything is fine and totally lush babes.
In terms of W’s delayed development, I am taken aback by the lack of support he is receiving from his parents. It could be a case of things going on “behind the scenes” but I find this hard to believe as everything they do is plastered across Instagram.
This only leads me to think that R must be embarrassed, ashamed or in denial about W’s development. My son is 3 and his delayed development was picked up at his 2 year check, and by his very supportive nursery that he has been attending 3 times a week since he was just under one. He does speech therapy which we do privately as the NHS waiting list was so long due to covid. He’s also been referred to be assessed for possible autism. We are doing everything that we can to help and support him because THAT IS WHAT PARENTS DO RACH.
I find R’s apparent lack of awareness nothing short of shocking and surely this constitutes as neglect (maybe I’m wrong?). Hopefully W will have his 2 year check soon and things will be picked up. But if they checks are still being done over the phone due to covid, assume R will just tell them everything is fine and totally lush babes.
I wonder this. She can't be that much in denial, and it's not like he's her first. Yes, the lock downs will have affected a lot of kids in different ways, but my friends daughter is the same kinda age and although she missed out on toddler groups to start with, she was only shy for about half an hour and then off happily playing, chatting with other kids the same age.I had a nosy at those 2 accounts she met with yesterday. They do seem to do stuff with their kids so I think the friendships will be short lived when they realise what a crap parent she is. They surely must see the difference in development between W and their babies (who appear to be actual lockdown babies). Rach must be able to see it too
Hahaha
Bear in mind that even during lockdown they had every man and his dog traipsing through the house (Rachey's paid mates, all the tradesmen doing the work on the house etc), he's been palmed off to other people left, right and centre (Emily, Stabby Jo, the school mum who looked after him while her and Joyce were on the poverty porn tour). He's seen plenty of different people outside of the immediate family, plus he's had days out at the beach, the zoo etc. Unfortunately the pandemic has given Racquet a handy excuse to just write him off as a "lockdown baby" when in reality there are a lot of children who have had a very different experience to Wilby and don't seem to struggle as much as he has been. Her and PC Pigeon Legs act like they're a pair of teenagers with their first baby, despite having had 5 kids between them previously, I think it's clear that neither of them were very involved in parenting their kids at a young age, they have absolutely no idea.
Starting to notice a pattern here, what have they got to hide? This was a few weeks ago, covering up Joyce's hand with the heart everytime he moved it. I watched another story where she is throwing Wilby onto the bed and the sleeve is pulled down on that arm. Then again it could be nothing
Probably embarrassed and covering up all the shite tattoosStarting to notice a pattern here, what have they got to hide? This was a few weeks ago, covering up Joyce's hand with the heart everytime he moved it. I watched another story where she is throwing Wilby onto the bed and the sleeve is pulled down on that arm. Then again it could be nothing
View attachment 697529
I’ve just rewatched the bed throwing, and I don’t know about you, but that makes me so uncomfortable that one sleeve is up and one is down. It’s either one of the other
The remit for that is super narrow and they make it clear that any investigation would be rare. In Raqs case I genuinely believe from what is put there, that it would get signposted to the Local Safeguarding Children's Board (or equivalent) for any safeguarding concerns or police for any fraud concerns
100% agree. The vagueness ONLY works in her favour to not commit to anything. Doesn't benefit the people who will be accessing the service who should be her priority, who she is stringing along by not clarifying when people post saying she's opened a bloody refuge
Not only the same day, they all started within three hours of each other! I’m obviously doing something wrong as my daughters obviously don’t hide that they are on their period but neither do they check in with with an exact time when it happens
I bet the reason all the kids go away on a Wed night is so they can get a tit in peace without worrying about it ending up on Instagram. I bet they all bung themselves up with eggs thurs-tues then binge on prunes for a relaxing 2 hour
on a wed night. Be kinds boyfriend is hopefully training as a plumber so you can dislodge the Boulder she produces round his 
God I've just read my last post back and I'm giving myself EmPen vibes 
promise I'm not, can't afford a holiday!
For what it's worth I've seen the impact meaningful CICs make. With everything, there are people who exploit the system (Torbay seems to be rife with it!). It feels like nobody really wants to take ownership or responsibility for CICs as they can be so varied in terms of who they're supporting and how, which is *I think* why the signposting for concerns happens and why there isn't a one size fits all approach for complaining about a CIC - it depends what aspect you're complaining about. I have this really bad gut feeling that if one of us were to complain about it, we would need more than screenshots from social media with what we know so far. (I don't agree with that - if it exposes the concerns then it should be enough and things might change in the future once the centre is actually open as we will see whether she is exposing vulnerable people or confidential info). Someone who had accessed the service might be better placed to complain, but my issue with that is that vulnerable people can't always see when they're not being protected if they've been, essentially, groomed to believe they can trust those who are supporting them. I just really hope they've all got their level 3 safeguarding training which is current and up to date and they keep media consent forms outlining how their info and images can be used on public social media/websites. Service users can change or revoke these permissions at any point too and you have to act - so highlights etc would be an issue. Someone who accessed the centre could also complain to the ICO if they felt their information wasn't stored appropriately or being used how it was intended/what they agreed to
promise I'm not, can't afford a holiday!For what it's worth I've seen the impact meaningful CICs make. With everything, there are people who exploit the system (Torbay seems to be rife with it!). It feels like nobody really wants to take ownership or responsibility for CICs as they can be so varied in terms of who they're supporting and how, which is *I think* why the signposting for concerns happens and why there isn't a one size fits all approach for complaining about a CIC - it depends what aspect you're complaining about. I have this really bad gut feeling that if one of us were to complain about it, we would need more than screenshots from social media with what we know so far. (I don't agree with that - if it exposes the concerns then it should be enough and things might change in the future once the centre is actually open as we will see whether she is exposing vulnerable people or confidential info). Someone who had accessed the service might be better placed to complain, but my issue with that is that vulnerable people can't always see when they're not being protected if they've been, essentially, groomed to believe they can trust those who are supporting them. I just really hope they've all got their level 3 safeguarding training which is current and up to date and they keep media consent forms outlining how their info and images can be used on public social media/websites. Service users can change or revoke these permissions at any point too and you have to act - so highlights etc would be an issue. Someone who accessed the centre could also complain to the ICO if they felt their information wasn't stored appropriately or being used how it was intended/what they agreed to
Poor little boy , the quirky Etsy type clothing he is dressed in (nude coloured leggings tucked in tops, rompers and tops with his name on ) would make any child of nearly 2 look like a giant and the babyish outfits look so at odds with the little old man haircut they insist on giving him .
She’s on the hellofresh now, is that because gousto wouldn’t pay u to promote them? U stupid twit
Couldn’t get a gousto ad, moved on to hello fresh…
So is she sharing that discount code or just pointing out that she's ordered a box? She's not really thought it through.
- Status