100% this.
R should never have mentioned the boys past. It isn’t her story to tell.
And if she hadn’t, it wouldn’t be discussed here and we wouldn’t know their mothers name or speculate that the boys may or may not be better off elsewhere.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
R should never have mentioned the boys past. It isn’t her story to tell.
And if she hadn’t, it wouldn’t be discussed here and we wouldn’t know their mothers name or speculate that the boys may or may not be better off elsewhere.
Oh just STOP with this narrative that raising welfare concerns with SS is a potentially deadly act. We are taught with regard to safeguarding to be cautious and to raise anything that might be a concern even if it turns out to be innocent. We are NOT taught to “stop wasting social services time” by raising concerns over the welfare of children.
It makes me so sad that even people who WORK for child services are so drawn in by an abuser and all round terrible bleeping parent, that they’re willing to try and stop people reporting what they feel could be a potentially abusive situation. The fact remains, those poor kids have absolutely NO safeguarding, a nice home and lots of things yes, safeguarding nope.
Absolutely, better to be safe than sorry.
Ah I forgot, we’re all the nasty trolls though aren’t we.
We’re on here for a reason, and that reason is because R is an awful, manipulative, destructive liar.
We’re on here for a reason, and that reason is because R is an awful, manipulative, destructive liar.
Imagine you are just at the end of the first day out of lockdown and it’s been fab. You’ve been to Primark, everything is just wonderful
Then you open up Instagram and you’ve got this self absorbed lunatic and her gimpy husband banging on about children in care DYING, because their local SS has them on speed dial.
Just because ss decide to close a case, doesn't mean its a false allegation. It just means there isn't cause for concern.
I have had phone calls from them in the past purely for a welfare check due to my partners past MH. They found everything was good and closed the case. I didn't think it was a malicious allegation, in fact I was grateful someone was checking up on me and caring about us.
They have a duty of care to follow reports up, because what IF they missed a report and put it down to malicious reports,and that abuse escalated.... abuse starts somewhere (I'm not at all stating they are abusing the kids btw)
.........
The fact that the video disappeared immediately, says that V realised it wasn’t the best move to post it.
I assume they want to expose R desperately and tell everyone why she shouldn’t be trusted but are worried about B & T.
That’s the way I see it anyway
I imagine that unlike Rachel they have a conscience. She writes stuff or does things and doesn’t care who gets hurt. She’ll twist things and make out everyone else has a problem, nothing is her fault. The Q&A proved that.Vanessa has taken down the post now. Honestly don’t know what to think about any of it at this point. All I do know is that everyone says Tattle is awful blah, blah and all we do is pop on to this one place, have a laugh and then pop off.
It’s everyone else running around the internet claiming tit & shite. Absolute weirdos
The fact that the video disappeared immediately, says that V realised it wasn’t the best move to post it.
I assume they want to expose R desperately and tell everyone why she shouldn’t be trusted but are worried about B & T.
That’s the way I see it anyway
ahh okay - yours is the first nursery i’ve heard that actually wears masks! We’re only allowed to wear masks if a child starts to show symptoms of covid. (although we don’t have many communal areas tbh)
But R has parental responsibility over her children and can decide what to film even secretly and what to post online. V doesn’t and would probably be the one in trouble after what really is a secret recording of a conversation about a family argument. I’m sorry but I’m very sceptical about the reality of everything we’ve heard about this supposed V. This does not mean I agree with the morality of what R has done or the posting of the intimate lives of her kids.
Each to their own. I believe v over scammy Rachaele . Also at 16 B can say no to her mother posting. It’s clear B had comfort from v and her sisters over the years . I do think it’s been a last resort v posting it and if it wasn’t for gob shits on here broadcasting v’s page no one would have seen said video, I didn’t.
Sur
I totally agree I think its totally off limits. I have reported the poster.
I didn’t see the video and I don’t look on the profiles of side characters in these peoples lives. Not saying I believe or disbelieve anyone. Just saying Rach parental responsibility gives her a right to decide things for her kids up to the age of 18.
I think V wanted it to be seen by Tattle contributors. Happy to be corrected but pretty sure @Hannabannna knows V and/or her family in real life and they posted here alerting us to the video. I get the impression (again, happy to be corrected) that V wants us to know the truth and maybe even to help get the word out there about Rachel. I think she and her kids, and Rachel’s kids, have been put through a LOT by Rachel and they’re sick of it.
Judging by her post yesterday, and what Ava posted here, V made a moral judgement to resign as director from the CIC because Emily is untrained and she felt that Rachel didn’t behave appropriately in filming Emily drunk and vulnerable. Instead of that fact being accepted rationally, Rachel has kicked off and accused V of being mentally unwell and told people that she sacked her. I think most people in V’s situation would want the truth out there.
I've set up a new thread 
PTWM #73 About to launch a bogus CIC, PTWM has ramped up the “woe-is-me”
Well done to @Lucyinthesky88 for winning thread suggestion with 39 likes 👏 Previous thread: https://tattle.life/threads/ptwm-72-forgot-to-buy-easter-eggs-turning-food-to-mush-toilet-is-a-prison-cell.18005/ Please submit thread suggestions from page 40 onwards, makes it easier to find and less...
tattle.life
I find it weird that people are diagnosing a baby from what they see on an insta story. Yes, R has always got the camera shoved in his face but remember, it’s only when he’s throwing a wobbler, being difficult or making R lose the will to live. None of that has anything to do with W or the way he’s developing. He’s just got a mum that exploits every single temper tantrum and weird quirk for views.
- Status