Was just going to say that.
It will be posted that stalkers have ruined Bs job, targeted her etc etc and the huns will lap it up.
I’m starting to think she’s posting this stuff on purpose to see what the reactions will be here then she can go back to her huns with proof that we’re all trolls out to ruin her life.
I hope so, and that they all come here and see the evidence of all the lies for themselves and people’s eyes are opened.Was just going to say that.
It will be posted that stalkers have ruined Bs job, targeted her etc etc and the huns will lap it up.
I’m starting to think she’s posting this stuff on purpose to see what the reactions will be here then she can go back to her huns with proof that we’re all trolls out to ruin her life.
And the fact that betsy was a regular customer there before she started working so they would have got to know her before handRegardless though the company is breaking employment law and they will know this - all
wee ice cream shops often use teens and they know what they can work etc just some break rules and it suits folk so nobody says anything. Rachel is the issue because she shouted out about it! The company can’t pretend they didn’t know her age as you have to prove who you are to start etc and everyone knows kids can’t work much even if we as non-employers don’t know the exact amount of hours
Don't shoot me but for once I don't understand why you're all blaming R?
Yes, she could have kept her big gob shut BUT it's SCOOPZ who are making children work illegal hours, so I'm thankful she stupidly spoke up!
They didn't even deny it, just played dumb and said they'd look into it. So if they do get shut down, then it's 100% their own fault!
All business owners know the law. They all know what hours minors can work and they will all know the age of their employees.
I actually think R's telling the truth on this one but didn't realise the implications.
If everything is above board at Scoopz then nothing will be done, so happy fucking days
I don't take many things in life seriously but child exploitation and modern day slavery are 2 of them.
It shouldn't be the 'norm' to have minors working illegal hours in ice cream shops and if it is in your area, then you should report it.
Yep, I took the time to find out the law on this for my teen. I am responsible and it appears I know more than an ex PO.I’m blaming BOTH of them.
The company (if true) should know the law (ignorance is not a defence) BUT as her parent she should be questioning 11 hour shifts at 15. I do 12 hr shifts and I’m double Bs age and I’m completely funked after!
Same, I definitely blame both. Scoopz should not be exploiting Betsy (or any other 15 year old) for regular 10 hour shifts of cheap labour (bearing in mind someone a few years older would command almost double her wage for the same job). But Rachel is also not innocent. For Betsy to be working legally, Rachel should have applied for a permit for her, which would have explained the legal requirements. Either she did and she doesn’t give a shit that Betsy is breaking the law (having a police officer in the house seems to make her feel untouchable), or she didn’t, in which case she’s an idiot. Either way, she’s to blame as much as the company. ESPECIALLY to advertise that Betsy is working and WHERE she’s workingI’m blaming BOTH of them.
The company (if true) should know the law (ignorance is not a defence) BUT as her parent she should be questioning 11 hour shifts at 15. I do 12 hr shifts and I’m double Bs age and I’m completely funked after!
Yes I agree, in this it is only Betsy that is being exploited by both parties and yeah she may have wanted to work extra hours (even though she shouldn’t) but now she’s missing out.Thing is it’s poor Betsy that will miss out, no part of her life is private. Everyone knows everything about her hobbies, bedroom, friends, tantrums, first heartbreak even her periods ffs now the only chance she had of a normal life outside the Adams family might get taken away from her.
Just saw that on their Instagram page they have removed the comment from someone saying they recieved a good delivery by betsy last night.
Clearly they know they have broken the law and are back tracking now. I wonder if they have contacted Rach this morning
That’s it exactly. None of us would have a clue if she didn’t use every possible thing she can for content. If she didn’t exploit her kids for likes we’d all be none the wiser.In my opinion this is all a bit petty but she brings it on herself completely by lying all the time and keeping her comments limited so no one can ask relevant questions. She’s avoided scrutiny over things like BLM and not dealing with racist comments, the AXA ad on International Womans Day, Josh’s job and how they are living by a complete set of lax laws to the rest of us, the way she cultivates bullying in her page, the historic money questions and exploiting the kids.
None of this is going to end well. Especially for the kids. If she stood outside of her own ego for 5 minutes, she’d learn something valuable to move forward with.
Again though what do I know? I’m just a jealous, bitter old troll
I thinks Scoopz reply to a poster here was sufficient enough and reporting them to authorities was not necessary. Yes we all chat shit about Rach, but that’s probably someone’s business facing a probe over one Sunday with Betsy. Reporting them before giving them a chance to correct something was too much.We all know R is a shit parent anyway who exploits B every, single day....just not illegally. So of course she won't give two hoots about her work hours! That's just who she is, as a 'mother'
Wow. Okay. I don't know either of them. I used to follow R then unfollowed after her tattle rant.I thinks Scoopz reply to a poster here was sufficient enough and reporting them to authorities was not necessary. Yes we all chat shit about Rach, but that’s probably someone’s business facing a probe over one Sunday with Betsy. Reporting them before giving them a chance to correct something was too much.
Im just going to say it and I’m not attempting to moderate, but I think you know Rach and Josh very personally and have lots of problems that you all need to sort out offline. Every time this thread takes a serious turn away from banter, it’s because a relatively new account has gone to far. Tattles not meant for that
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?