Hi everyone what's the spotted Paignton story please. Its been a long time since I've been on these threads
And then of course it's all the fault of Jo because she should have said no, not got the funds rat face.She buys things for the temporary rush of euphoria spending money brings her. Doesn't really matter what it is. She gets a buzz from it. But of course Jo has to authorise any purchases because thinking about money makes her poorly in the head.
I seemed to recognise those crappy "multi coloured " trainers Rachel loves ....surely noone else wears them
Perhaps Queen Rachel ( patron saint of saving women) literary agent could have a chat with Rachet ( the best selling author) and explain the difference between fact and fiction. Obviously Rach doesnt know as she believes everything she says and writes is fact...or is it fiction. Where's that bloody thesaurus when I need itDon't forget she wasn't sure if her new book was fact or fiction, as the 2 coexist alongside each other in her head![]()
I thought the responses were the other way round at first - poor Tallulah doesn't deserve all this tit laid on herWhy on earth does she think its appropriate to put her tit on her 14 year old daughter (who has her own issues)
She's not your support dog Rachel. She's a child. A vulnerable child who YOU should protect from the Internet. She shouldn't even know about any of this. She should be oblivious. You're not at home with her. You give no shits about those kids. Stop sharing private messages for likes and sympathy. And stop using your child as therapy. It's all sorts of wrong. Poor L probably jumped at the chance for Rachel to like and listen to her.
the saddest thing is, this is what L so desperately needs. Someone who loves her and helps her blossom in privateAdded on mias account. Can’t see them already posted here but sorry if they have been
The Volvo wasnt owned, as far as I could make out that was on finance, or maybe it was a lease vehicle. Either way, the monthly repayments on that van would be HUGE £500 plus per month....how do I know, hubby did something similar with a car.They gave back the Volvo though didn’t they? If they owned it outright then they would have got quite a bit for it as they hold their value. Or if they leased then they may have given it back in exchange for the deposit for the van
It was a lease vehicle, Slosh's car is a lease vehicle too. The nearest place that sells vans is on the other side of the road so it would have been convenient to drop off her car and then cross over to pick up the van.The Volvo wasnt owned, as far as I could make out that was on finance, or maybe it was a lease vehicle. Either way, the monthly repayments on that van would be HUGE £500 plus per month....how do I know, hubby did something similar with a car.
Was it even a real question?? She could have posted it herself, great distraction for what has been going on on the spotted pages??It’s such an uncomfortable situation especially when there is a young girl involved. I don’t agree with it being played out on social media but I can’t say I blame Mia either. R as the adult and the parent, never had to address the situation with the sisters. She could have easily picked a different question to answer that day, she could have just ignored any questions the followers had about them, she didn’t need to go into detail about them in her book etc. This could have been avoided for the sake of T but I fear this is only the start.
And we should remember it was rach that started this. She went on her Instagram and told all her followers that Emily caught Vanessa out as her biggest troll. Vanessa, mia and ava all only posted things AFTER rach did that. Vanessa left the centre for a valid reason. She didn't like that rach wanted to take £60 from the centre funds for "donating" her old sofa and she didn't think Emily was suited for the job when she was so young and not long out of a DA situation herself. Now knowing that V thought that, I don't think it's any coincidence that it was Emily who 'found' Vanessa was the biggest troll tbh.It’s such an uncomfortable situation especially when there is a young girl involved. I don’t agree with it being played out on social media but I can’t say I blame Mia either. R as the adult and the parent, never had to address the situation with the sisters. She could have easily picked a different question to answer that day, she could have just ignored any questions the followers had about them, she didn’t need to go into detail about them in her book etc. This could have been avoided for the sake of T but I fear this is only the start.