I totally agree. I also believe that they will be flagging concerns about neglect (across all areas of his development), emotional abuse, and documenting how his behaviour directly contradicts the narrative of the parents around the impact that autism has on his functioning.Everything she's said so far, being that Nursery said that he is ready for mainstream school at the typical age, that he will eat new foods, that he can play without routine when encouraged, that he is fine around the other children and shows interest in them.
Well it sounds to me like they are very diplomatically saying 'Get your tit together," to Rachael and Josh. If it was a case study I was reading to analyse. That's the take out for me .
I am in no doubt that R is being forced to transition him to school as part of a professional plan to protect W. That or keep him the nursery who clearly don't agree with her story about W. She has pushed her narrative so hard and seen portage, for example, as some sort of mark of severity of autism, that she lost sight of the scrutiny this would facilitate and the serious level of concern it would give rise to. It could even be the case that the children with disabilities (social work) team assessed him and raised concerns.
We will never know, but she is deflecting from something with the sudden avalanche of nursery-related posts. Add in the Betsy situation and moving Lula into her role and it is a very worrying position for those kids. Betty will see Lula taking over where she left off. R rubbing her nose in it to lure her back home. Wonder if B is upset about her mum throwing her dad under the bus and has been paid off? He's still her dad after all.