He’s not on the barred list though? Wouldn’t it be on there? X
Was there not something that said an officer had asked for and gotten anonymity (that was a challenge to spell at this time on a Friday ) because of MH concerns and we know Ratchet loves to exaggerate…He’s not on the barred list though? Wouldn’t it be on there? X
what the dickens?!?! This is too good to be true!I have it on good authority the police officer that was sacked is Sloshy. If you suspect he was illegally looking up your info on Tattle or any other social media please contact
Happy holiday Rachel!
Please be true! Thank god its the weekend and I have a couple of long car journeys as passenger to keep up with these threads, have a feeling this is going to move quickly!I have it on good authority the police officer that was sacked is Sloshy. If you suspect he was illegally looking up your info on Tattle or any other social media please contact
Happy holiday Rachel!
But that wouldn’t stop her coming on tattle anonymously as, say, for example, I don’t know, onlygrans and confirming a few things…I wonder if Emily is subject to an NDA. It wouldn't be unusual, working with vulnerable women and confidential information and then R would know all her secrets are safe?
but how would he know that I am who I am..? my username has no bearing with who i actually am?? sorry if it seems like a silly question but i don’t understand!It could be about data protection, he can’t look up anyones details unless they have been arrested (I think) someone might know more information.
he has found information and passed it on to Rach or her Solicitor and breached data protection
I checked the barred list last night. But the article published said that the decision was made not to publish the name of the officer, due to the risk of exacerbating mental health issues! Make of that what you will.He’s not on the barred list though? Wouldn’t it be on there? X
I think it might be more to do with @VCJR (as another tattler has said all the dates add up) if he knows her full name (Rach knows it) and he has gone into work and looked on the system and his reported back to Rach and she has announced it on SM it’s breach of data.but how would he know that I am who I am..? my username has no bearing with who i actually am?? sorry if it seems like a silly question but i don’t understand!
Absolutely this! As much as we'd all like it to be true, without receipts it's just hearsay.I feel now might be a good time to remind everyone this is a gossip website. Nothing is fact unless its confirmed .