For me it's when people come on and say we shouldn't be talking about certain things or we should only be talking about the Paypal money. It's not the having different opinions that's the problem, it's the trying to moderate what we can or can't talk about.I know a lot of people say that when Rach has her troll rants it will send a lot of her huns over here and they will read everything and see what we see. But in all honesty, people aren't going to go straight to the wiki. I didn't. I read a few threads before I knew the wiki existed. And this last thread has been a bit too much for my liking. There's been a few comments of people jumping to conclusions about posts possibly being about R, the girls, Wilby etc..
Im definitely not a hun and I would like R to be found out for what she is and for people to stop being scammed by her. But this thread has made me uncomfortable with the way the girls especially have been spoken about and the names people have been called. A lot of you call out the huns for jumping on someone and criticise them, but that's exactly what a few people have done to the couple who have disagreed. It's like no one can have a different opinion other than r is a cunt. I still believe she is, don't get me wrong, but the way it's been worded and the way it's come across, if I was a hun coming and looking on here and reading this, I'd be going away thinking the opposite of what you guys what people to think.
Most of R's content comes from here, if the threads were shut down she wouldn't have anything to post about, no one could be blamed and the huns would see she was lying, but while people are jumping to conclusions so hoping that R is at the centre of everything but found out later its not about her or with people going in on the younger kids, it's not going to go how we all want it to.
Just my opinion before anyone jumps down my throat. I think sometimes we need to calm it down. It's one thing saying our opinions which need to be respected. It's a whole other thing wishing violence and harm to people, even people as bad as them! It makes us as bad as the huns!
And before anyone says it. No I don't agree with the girls being posted on social media for thousands to see and I do agree they are a bit too young to be dressed as they are, I just think the way some people have worded stuff or how intense and defensive some people have got about it has been really uncomfortable reading.
Usually threads have me in absolute tears of laughter, this one hasnt
Exactly! This is a gossip site. I’m a nosey cow and am here for the gossip. I’ve been told not to discuss certain people or get rants from the feminist snowflakes have chosen to completely miss the point being made just so they can have a rant and force their opinions. I just don’t take it that seriously.Totally get what you’re saying and I also don’t think it helps our “case” to not listen and respect other opinions but ultimately this is a thread on a gossip site, not a campaign for justice against a scammer. If people come here and don’t like what they see - oh wellthey’ll either agree or they won’t, I don’t think we’re likely to drastically change anything either way. Not to say I don’t think Rachel’s downfall will come - it will - but will it be because of this thread? Unlikely.
I think the point is he was shown by the guy behind him that he wasn’t happy about being filmed and also he’s still supposedly a Cop so should know better. Just no safeguarding there at all.Not being funny but I’ll stick up for josh but who doesn’t take pictures or videos of there kids on holiday with other kids in background and put it on social media? Everyone does. Big following or not we all do it
Oh yeah it'll be either R herself, one of the kids or these never ending friends that turn toxic within 6 months. But the point of the threads is R yet other people like the boys mum, E's dad, other family members are bought up and it's uncomfortable to read. They haven't chosen to put their lives on social media, R does it (wrongly) but I think we need to respect the fact they don't do it and not mention them.
Plus I defended a lot of comments about the kids when the other person came on and said how harsh some people were about Wilby, I commented honestly that any criticism wasn't about the kids but about the parents. But in the last few pages there has been a lot of negativity towards the kids which is uncomfortable.
GG is Betsys best mate, no one knows a lot about her but she's mentioned harshly. Even B, yes she can be a bit bitchy sometimes but I think we need to realise this is R's parenting. They fight for her attention, if I was in that house I'd much rather suck up and be the favourite like B than be like I who is ignored or S who is bullied. Its like at school, the bullies leave you alone if you are on the side of the bully (again wrong but that's how it works). I think we just need to focus this on R and J and tone down the hopes of violence or name calling. Our point will be made much stronger for any hopeful tattlers in the future if we are seen to be nice trolls rather than nasty ones!
I
I'm not a hun trust me, but it's these types of comments that doesn't helpI'm allowed to feel uncomfortable at some people's comments about certain people who aren't the topic of this thread? I'm allowed my own opinion correct?
I’ve never taken a photo at a pool or water park and I would feel uncomfortable if someone had a camera out around my children there, same as on the beach - I’ve taken photos of my kids on the beach but never with other kids clearly visible and I hate it when someone is openly filming, makes me wonder why.Not being funny but I’ll stick up for josh but who doesn’t take pictures or videos of there kids on holiday with other kids in background and put it on social media? Everyone does. Big following or not we all do it
I haven't read any of the others threads tbh. I'd best not go and read them thenOf course you’re allowed an opinion, and equally so are those who want to talk about the kids, Rachel’s face, Josh’s lack of balls, Emily/Stabby/Katie/Astrid etc etc.
The crucial argument for us not being nasty trolls is that we don’t send anything directly to Rachel, it’s all discussed here.
Tbh this thread is quite tame compared to some others. I’m occasionally on the Radford family thread too and some of the language used and things said about their children is really low; a lot worse than is said about Rachel’s kids.
Not being funny but I’ll stick up for josh but who doesn’t take pictures or videos of there kids on holiday with other kids in background and put it on social media? Everyone does. Big following or not we all do it
Me neither and can’t see any good reason why someone wouldn’t at least block faces our. Odd behaviour.Of course you’re allowed an opinion, and equally so are those who want to talk about the kids, Rachel’s face, Josh’s lack of balls, Emily/Stabby/Katie/Astrid etc etc.
The crucial argument for us not being nasty trolls is that we don’t send anything directly to Rachel, it’s all discussed here.
Tbh this thread is quite tame compared to some others. I’m occasionally on the Radford family thread too and some of the language used and things said about their children is really low; a lot worse than is said about Rachel’s kids.
I’ve never taken a photo at a pool or water park and I would feel uncomfortable if someone had a camera out around my children there, same as on the beach - I’ve taken photos of my kids on the beach but never with other kids clearly visible and I hate it when someone is openly filming, makes me wonder why.
Most people aren’t posting to a public account with hundreds of thousands of people on them though that’s the differenceNot being funny but I’ll stick up for josh but who doesn’t take pictures or videos of there kids on holiday with other kids in background and put it on social media? Everyone does. Big following or not we all do it
I’m the same, I’m on a few and this one seems quite tame. The Sasha fontain thread of about #14/15 went through in 2 days flat. She was proper getting up peoples noses and being vile about disabled people and people who had illnesses. Outing people and spreading lies. She was full of her own bullshit, had fights on holiday, kicked off with men who had paid for her to go away… so all in all this is tameOf course you’re allowed an opinion, and equally so are those who want to talk about the kids, Rachel’s face, Josh’s lack of balls, Emily/Stabby/Katie/Astrid etc etc.
The crucial argument for us not being nasty trolls is that we don’t send anything directly to Rachel, it’s all discussed here.
Tbh this thread is quite tame compared to some others. I’m occasionally on the Radford family thread too and some of the language used and things said about their children is really low; a lot worse than is said about Rachel’s kids.
I’ve never taken a photo at a pool or water park and I would feel uncomfortable if someone had a camera out around my children there, same as on the beach - I’ve taken photos of my kids on the beach but never with other kids clearly visible and I hate it when someone is openly filming, makes me wonder why.
Brilliant.......I sang that as I read itNew thread title suggestion:
Two little dickie birds living rent free, S.C.A.M.M.I.N.G
Literally just read a comment on the Radford thread calling one of their children a “fucking ugly bitch”I haven't read any of the others threads tbh. I'd best not go and read them thenit makes me sad when children turn out like their parents, especially parents like R&J. You can tell all of those kids are amazing, they are just massively failed! I just hope they all have other influences in their life so they aren't too far gone when they finally leave home.
And compared to the Kate Hayes threadThis thread is very tame compared to Stephen bear
THIS!Totally get what you’re saying and I also don’t think it helps our “case” to not listen and respect other opinions but ultimately this is a thread on a gossip site, not a campaign for justice against a scammer. If people come here and don’t like what they see - oh wellthey’ll either agree or they won’t, I don’t think we’re likely to drastically change anything either way. Not to say I don’t think Rachel’s downfall will come - it will - but will it be because of this thread? Unlikely.
I don't know how you guys can keep up with several threads at a time! I barely have time to read this oneLiterally just read a comment on the Radford thread calling one of their children a “fucking ugly bitch”
I used to post pics of my daughter/family on my Facebook page without thinking but then I got a message from my abusive ex husband ( he's not my child's father divorced him before meeting my child's father) saying he'd seen my daughter's picture on Facebook through a friend of a friend's Facebook and said he couldn't believe somebody had actually had a child with me and other abusive BS that I won't get into here. I thought I had my privacy settings set so only my friends could see what I posted and that myself and my family were protected from my monster of an ex but you can't control what others share online even when you ask them not to in my case! I had moved from one end of the country to the other to escape my ex and now he knew where I lived, what my child looked like and God knows what else. So from a safeguarding point of view I can see why it's important not to post pictures with other people's kids in clear view, you don't if they are part of a child protection order for example, always a good idea to block out their faces.Not being funny but I’ll stick up for josh but who doesn’t take pictures or videos of there kids on holiday with other kids in background and put it on social media? Everyone does. Big following or not we all do it
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?