I know, I'm loving Jedward on twitter. Yes the whole women using their sexuality argument was very eye rolly.
I know, I'm loving Jedward on twitter. Yes the whole women using their sexuality argument was very eye rolly.Jedward are a bit of a voice for the people at the momentPiers is creepily obsessed with how women conduct themselves. I've never seen him cry when his precious Ronaldo is pictured topless. Honestly I'd keep my mouth shut about morality if I'd been caught doing what he's done in the past.
He left GMB on 9 March and the conversation today was less to do with what he thought about things/what he had done and more to do with posters views on MM and the RF imoI felt that the Meghan conversation was relevant, as Piers left his job because of comments he made about her - when has last a presenter left a job in a similar situation? I understand the need/wish to discuss this, it happened so quickly and was mind-boggling. The discussion was whether he was right to not believe her and critique her in the way he did, so of course she will also be a topic.
If I get a warning for saying this so be it, but I learned that it is always ok to voice my opinion (as long as it is respectful).
Maybe you didn’t see the posts that were deleted but a lot of what was said today looked to me to be just examples of what Meghan did, what the Royal Family said over the course of the last few years - that’s the point I’m making. Of course MM is still linked to Piers Morgan and this will crop up over the course of his career but his thread is not the place - in my opinion - to have another post mortem over whether Meghan wanted people moved at Wimbledon or which of the Royal Family is the alleged racist, and the Mods obviously thought so as they put up a warning and removed posts.He recently gave an interview on Fox, this was only a few days ago. I also haven't had time to fully consider all of it, as I am occupied during the day.
Yes, of course people have different opinions as to whether what happened was right - and this has to do with whether Piers was right to criticise and disbelieve this individual that made him ultimately leave GMB.
So the actions of this individual are very much linked and relevant - it happened to be MM, but could have been someone else (Hancock for example, Piers was very harsh towards him. At some point I thought there have to be consequences - if it would have been Hancock then the discussion would have been around whether Hancock was competent or not)
about 22 comments have been removed, all about Meghan Markle’s personality,I felt that the Meghan conversation was relevant, as Piers left his job because of comments he made about her - when has last a presenter left a job in a similar situation? I understand the need/wish to discuss this, it happened so quickly and was mind-boggling. The discussion was whether he was right to not believe her and critique her in the way he did, so of course she will also be a topic.
If I get a warning for saying this so be it, but I learned that it is always ok to voice my opinion (as long as it is respectful).
Back to Piers Morgan..........
..........
.........
..................
like him or not, GMB has plummeted because of his exit.
have to disagree, his interviews frustrated the hell out of me, he never let anyone speak, he made everything about himself, I’d never watch GMB for hard hitting news content and I don’t watch it at all, just the interviews on playback if I’m interested in who’s on/during the pandemic, but as a morning news type show it’s lost all appeal, nobody on the panel can draw the attention he did and they don’t have the talent to conduct an interesting interviewGMB is miles better without his booming foghorn and constant interruptions.
A lot of people don't agree with you given that viewing figures are now well below one million; the show is as dull as dishwater without him.GMB is miles better without his booming foghorn and constant interruptions.
A lot of people don't agree with you given that viewing figures are now well below one million; the show is as dull as dishwater without him.
Your expressing you anger but thats by the by, just add 'IMO' to some of your statements to help clarify things please.I don't care who agrees or disagrees; as everyone else is doing, I am expressing my opinion.
How can me saying the programme is better without him be anything BUT an opinion? I do not need to be told how to post by you or anyone else. You do seem to have difficulty understanding simple posts and you were called out on that in the Sir Captain Tom Moore thread.Your expressing you anger but thats by the by, just add 'IMO' to some of your statements to help clarify things please.
Mind you, I think Ranvir Singh gives him a run for his money in the domineering stakes, she takes over and doesn’t let anyone get a word in edgeways either, imoGMB is miles better without his booming foghorn and constant interruptions.
Oh yes, full of 'do you know what I mean' and 'you know' etc.Mind you, I think Ranvir Singh gives him a run for his money in the domineering stakes, she takes over and doesn’t let anyone get a word in edgeways either, imo
Your angry again, please stop SHOUTING in your posts. I did apologies on the Sir Tom thread which I'll do when wrong (I still think many of the posts referring to his family are vile though and shame on those who post them). Breath in with the good and breath out the badHow can me saying the programme is better without him be anything BUT an opinion? I do not need to be told how to post by you or anyone else. You do seem to have difficulty understanding simple posts and you were called out on that in the Sir Captain Tom Moore thread.
IMVHO of course. If that's clear enough. (That's in my very humble opinion).
Your angry again, please stop SHOUTING in your posts. I did apologies on the Sir Tom thread which I'll do when wrong (I still think many of the posts referring to his family are vile though and shame on those who post them). Breath in with the good and breath out the bad
Your angry again, please stop SHOUTING in your posts. I did apologies on the Sir Tom thread which I'll do when wrong (I still think many of the posts referring to his family are vile though and shame on those who post them). Breath in with the good and breath out the bad
This is fucking embarrassing to read.It's you're, not your.
Can you please elucidate and advise where I was shouting? I wrote the IMVHO in caps as that is proper English. Stop nit picking and telling everyone how to behave. When you become a moderator you will be able to exert some power.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?