Have you actually just joined these threads? Because clearly you haven't read lots of posts from members with their own personal accounts of being groomed. The fact that it has consequences mentally for the rest of your life. I suggest you go back under that rock you came from.Grooming is not illegal either unless it leads to sex with someone under 18 or financial abuse
Sounds like something only a paed0 themselves would say. Someone ought to check your hard driveWell if you really want to be that pedantic (and even the above in relation to Schofield is disputed) it is not illegal to be a paedophile, it is only illegal to commit paedophilic acts of underage sex with minors
Let's just see what happens over the next few days and best of luck to you finding someone on here to agree with your viewsThe point is there is no evidence he is a paedophile as some on here were alleging earlier in a libellous fashion and certainly no evidence he committed illegal paedophilic sexual acts with someone under 18
Well if you really want to be that pedantic (and even the above in relation to Schofield is disputed) it is not illegal to be a paedophile, it is only illegal to commit paedophilic acts of underage sex with minorsif you are sexually attracted to minors (which grooming behaviour would indicate), then (whether or not a relationship begins at 18) you are a pedophile. Being a pedophile is defined by the attraction, not the actions. I think you’re getting confused between the definitions of child sexual abuse and pedophilia.
Simon owned the now defunct two-faced theatre school. He met PS as a young teen and was given certain opportunities. He remained friends with PS and is thought to have encouraged MM. There may be more.What's the deal with Simon Schofield? I thought he was Phillip's brother who recently went to jail for child sex crimes, but it turns out hes a friend whose also a bit suspect? Are we talking about 3 Schofields who have murkey grooming charges here? Somebody explain pls!
The Sky falling in on Philip SavilleI've just woken up from a two-month coma, what have I missed?
Absolutely I reckon so. I used to work with Ranj. An amazing Dr so I hope none of this backfires ok him but I reckon he knows exactly what is to comeIs there even more stuff coming out that we don’t even know about?
How do you think MM and potential other victims feel about this? Do you think they agree that he should be ‘left alone’ now? Or are they perhaps feeling rather fucked off about what happened to them and would be glad to see the whole story out in the open?He only made a statement as the story was going to break with or without him. His recent humiliation has left him rather vulnerable, a time in which the media love to prey on people, therefore he has no protection to prevent the story we already knew about from breaking. I do think the press need to stop picking at this scab and leave the man alone. He's lost his career, and is now known for what he really is, so it should be left there before the man ends up topping himself. If there is a legal matter to answer to, the chap he was involved with all those years ago should speak to a solicitor, then the police.