lauren96111
VIP Member
Oh so that type of behaviour towards children should be dismissed?Grooming is not illegal either unless it leads to sex with someone under 18 or financial abuse
Oh so that type of behaviour towards children should be dismissed?Grooming is not illegal either unless it leads to sex with someone under 18 or financial abuse
I don't blame Eamonn and Ruth or the others. Phil has very deep pockets and ITV management were kissing his feet. If anyone said anything they probably wouldn't work again and get sued for millions with itv helping Philth do it. I'm not sure even Eamonn and Ruth could afford the amount of money needed if he won a court battle.Spot on. I don't blame them either.
Look at all the people he managed to oust. Look at the fact that he was given a platform to announce his 'coming out'. WTF! There's just so much harm he did to so many people over the years and he was protected by ITV no matter what.
I think it's very unfair of anyone to blame people like Eamonn (and Ruth) for not speaking out.
Even yet, there will be apologists for Schofield, I am sure, attempting to defend him. The lowlife creep,
Sorry if someone is grooming a child from a young age to eventually lead to a sexual relationship they have got to of viewed that child in a sexual way. Just because he's tried to be clever and not cross the line of illegal activity doesn't mean he doesn't think like a paedophile.No it doesn't but nor does it make them a paedophile, as some comments were starting to suggest
Who gave Rose West get access to tattle?The point is there is no evidence he is a paedophile as some on here were alleging earlier in a libellous fashion and certainly no evidence he committed illegal paedophilic sexual acts with someone under 18
Loose women have to go the very worst!For him to admit this now, it must mean hes trying to distract from something bigger or trying to get his side of the story out before the weekend papers do.
Time for the ITV Top Brass to go, and get in some new people with fresh ideas.
Retire Lorraine, revamp This Morning and get rid of the gobby Loose women.
Timothy will throw him under a bus theres zero morals in that family. It's s probably him who's phoned the DM. His brothers disowned him and Philth got off scot free. I think it goes much deeper he's in the shit. His brother was comfortable to discuss sexually abusing kids with him who the fuck would do that? Pedalos keep it quiet unless it's to other pedalos they stick together.I kinda get where TYL159 is coming from, as I did post the other Week a similar post.
Mine was saying I think he's a groomer but I feel PS was careful enough to not cross the line of illegal behavior( be that underage sex or sexting teens)
I think you're being a little bit sensitive. There was a point in time where 'pourqoui' was a thing for 'why'? I know because I did and still do use it.Why not ask the same question in English?
I said earlier they are on hereHere comes crisis management
It's a discussion about Philip Schofield. We're allowed to discuss behaviour that we find disgusting even if it's not illegal.This is a discussion about the law, which we still have, not the rule of the mob
I don't believe he believed it at the time. He was sat there while she did the supportive talking with a face on him like he could smell a fart.
All of these people are coming out of the woodwork now because the tide's turning & saying what they know won't endanger their lucrative on screen jobs any more. But every one of them could have said what they knew then or long before then & even had they never worked another day in television, they'd have had enough money to live like kings for the rest of their lives.
There are no excuses for them. It's not like a nurse at Stoke Infirmary whose family would have starved had she spoken out & been sacked. it's not like being a cleaner at BBC studios saying nowt about the girls being nonced backstage at TOP and facing eviction for non payment of rent when they get sacked for it is it?
If he's done nothing wrong then why has he lost his jobIt is illegal to have sex with those under 18 or watch sexual images of those under 18, none of which is in dispute. However there is also no evidence Schofield engaged in either activity. Unfortunately some on here with IQs of 2 figures or less can't understand that and the difference between what may be ill judged behaviour and illegal behaviour
It's a very peculiar hill you've chosen to take the moral high ground on.He could have invited hundreds of young men 18 or over to his flat. Clearly he was no saint, that doesn't mean he did anything illegal either
I left for about 10 minutes come back to +5 pages to readThe last thread must have been the quickest in tattle history![]()
🥱 Did you go up to double pay after 1am?It is illegal to have sex with those under 18 or watch sexual images of those under 18, none of which is in dispute. However there is also no evidence Schofield engaged in either activity. Unfortunately some on here with IQs of 2 figures or less can't understand that and the difference between what may be ill judged behaviour and illegal behaviour