Phillip Schofield #21 Philthy man and brother too, unveil them, jail them and castrate them too!

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Unfortunately I think we are not going to get anything from Dan, I remember seeing initial articles that he was involved in helping Phil “control his own narrative” by cutting an exclusive deal with the sun.
Dan Wooten will only ever do anything if it directly benefits him anyway. He is a master manipulator. I can’t stand him but I think he could be the only way Philth gets exposed as he has huge backing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 22
Can we just take a minute to remember that Savile is spelt with one L, not two. As in VILE, appropriately enough!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 16
Philth had better be careful, now he has publicly disowned his brother, the brother has nothing left to lose. Imagine what he might know, and what he might now feel able to say if he does...?
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 25
I wonder does Phil ever sit down and think is all this really worth it? What is the point of making all this money just to have to pay it all out to crisis management, injunctions and god knows whoever else? When everyone knows the truth anyway?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 22
Philth had better be careful, now he has publicly disowned his brother, the brother has nothing left to lose. Imagine what he might know, and what he might now feel able to say if he does...?
That is exactly what I was thinking.Dangerous situation.He is going to need money at some point and now Phil has disowned him,what's to stop him going nuclear on him?.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
Philth had better be careful, now he has publicly disowned his brother, the brother has nothing left to lose. Imagine what he might know, and what he might now feel able to say if he does...?
Yeah I’m sure he’ll quickly ‘commit suicide’ in prison before that happens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
I wonder does Phil ever sit down and think is all this really worth it? What is the point of making all this money just to have to pay it all out to crisis management, injunctions and god knows whoever else? When everyone knows the truth anyway?
The access to young men keeps him going probably.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9
I wonder does Phil ever sit down and think is all this really worth it? What is the point of making all this money just to have to pay it all out to crisis management, injunctions and god knows whoever else? When everyone knows the truth anyway?
No. In a word.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
That GB news panel seems like a right bunch of pillocks. Why would you be outraged that he disowned his brother? Fair enough pointing out it's a careerist move and if that's what they were moaning about I'd understand but their main point of contention seemed to be him saying he had disowned his pweirdo brother.

That guy on the end was like "That tells me more about Phil than his brother." duck off. I love my brother to bits but if he'd done something like that he'd be dead to me.
YES! The bottom line is that Phil knew his brother was molesting a kid and didn’t report it, then only when it became public did he say ‘I no longer have a brother’.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 24
Interesting timing for philth to quit Twitter? His last tweet was around the time his brother spoke to him (i think). If he knew the story was going to come out, could be be calculating enough to realise he'd not want his words forever tied to a shady timeline of sordid secrets and shame?
"Thanks for all the fun originally though"
This quote could be interpreted in all sorts of ways.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9
I think they are using that element of Philths statement to dig deeper into the debate about Philth, I don't think that is their main issue with Phillip Schofield,it's quite clever really, we know that's not what they mean, they know that's not what they mean and Phillip Schofield knows full well that's not what they mean! And as for Calvin, he may not be everyones cup of tea but he has likely challenged many people's thoughts about PS with his comments last night which can be nothing but a good thing
I absolutely agree with you. I thought it was a good slot, they discussed the only thing they were able to - Philth's statement about his brother, but clearly alluding to the fact that there's a lot about Philth they can't discuss. We aren't the only ones who are worried about his past activities, it's everywhere on social media, many many people will have watched that and it would have made them think that there is so much that can't be said. I think the lid of the can of worms may just have lifted a fraction. At least GB News have alluded to it, within their legal responsibilities, which is a damn sight more than any of the main, corrupt channels have done.
---
That is what Phil told the police Tim told him in his statement. It was just once, the boy was over the age of consent, they were pleasuring themselves and not each other
Bet that wasn't all Tim told him, but that's all Philth told the police, otherwise he could have been more heavily implicated. And Tim couldn't say otherwise because he pleaded not guilty. I reckon they discussed everything and that Tim felt safe saying it to Philth because he knew Philth had done exactly the same.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 21
Whilst I respect Dan and the GB News panelists for their obvious disdain for Schofield, they were talking a load of rubbish with the 'blood is thicker than water' stuff and I wouldn't exactly consider Calvin someone I'd want to hear about morals from.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
I find it really interesting that when Ian Watkins (vile beast) was tried and convicted, Fearne Cotton immediately distanced herself and nobody questioned if she had any idea of what kind of person she had shared her life with.

PS only has rumours swirling about him at this point, but I have seen many comments on social media questioning what hold PS has over Holly for her to continue socialising with him outside of the ITV studios. Obviously I am in no way saying Holly was involved or even knows for sure what PS gets up to with young boys but surely you would distance yourself, not just to protect your public image but also to protect your children. Even if I had only heard a few whispers about one of my friends being a n*nce, my hypothetic children would never be in the same room as them again And the friendship would be over. There’s no smoke without fire as they say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 16
OK in what way is their main problem being him disowning his disgusting brother digging deeper? Not trying to be snarky but a few people have said this as if there's some deeper message.

All I can see is from the panel is people repeating that "blood is thicker than water" crap and essentially saying its too harsh to disown a paedophile if you are related to them. I gather the bloke is a reverend so maybe it's a god thing. I dunno. I disagree with it and having never watched GB news I was hoping for more of a hard line stance from them.
I think it's more what Calvin alluded to rather than what they did say. They couldn't take a hard line stance and spill the beans because there is an injunction. I think, Calvin's expressions and throw away comments gave away how much more they knew. They only discussed the statement because its the only thing they could discuss without landing themselves in it. But didn't stop them putting a little spin on it!
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 14

Just seen this on tiktok.
I never thought that video would end😂

Just to say, I was at a Children In Need outdoor broadcast from Coventry circa 1992, and Bruno Brooks was there. My dad told my brother and I to get his autograph. We didn’t even know who he was. He told us to “get lost”😂

Just to add, in case anyone has jumped on this thread midway through and isn’t reading things in context and/or is a bit dense - I am in no way suggesting a grumpy Bruno Brroks is as bad or worse than a sex predator. If I have to add a footnote like this to every post, this thread is going to get pretty tedious. 🤡
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
In my experience the majority of people don’t distance themselves from relatives like this. Families are very complicated and if can be hard to break fully ties, especially when there is pressure applied from parents to get along. I don’t know if people realise, but the son of Mark Drakeford the Welsh first minister is also a convicted sex offender. He didn’t disown his son, only said ‘it was a very sad situation’ and left it that. That’s why Schofield‘s knee jerk disowning seemed so hollow and more about saving his own face and reputation than genuine revulsion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 25
I think it's more what Calvin alluded to rather than what they did say. They couldn't take a hard line stance and spill the beans because there is an injunction. I think, Calvin's expressions and throw away comments gave away how much more they knew. They only discussed the statement because its the only thing they could discuss without landing themselves in it. But didn't stop them putting a little spin on it!
I'm not going to keep banging on about it because I don't want to derail the thread. I guess having not watched GB News I just expected a bit more from its rep.

They could 100% have taken a harder stance than "It's wrong for him to disown the paedophile because he's his brother" without landing in hot water. I guess I don't watch enough to pick up on the coded secret messages everyone is commenting. Not sure if it's morse code from the blinks or something else y'all picking up on.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 4
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.