Just seen this on tiktok.
Dan Wooten will only ever do anything if it directly benefits him anyway. He is a master manipulator. I can’t stand him but I think he could be the only way Philth gets exposed as he has huge backing.Unfortunately I think we are not going to get anything from Dan, I remember seeing initial articles that he was involved in helping Phil “control his own narrative” by cutting an exclusive deal with the sun.
What footage is this?
That is exactly what I was thinking.Dangerous situation.He is going to need money at some point and now Phil has disowned him,what's to stop him going nuclear on him?.Philth had better be careful, now he has publicly disowned his brother, the brother has nothing left to lose. Imagine what he might know, and what he might now feel able to say if he does...?
Yeah I’m sure he’ll quickly ‘commit suicide’ in prison before that happens.Philth had better be careful, now he has publicly disowned his brother, the brother has nothing left to lose. Imagine what he might know, and what he might now feel able to say if he does...?
The access to young men keeps him going probably.I wonder does Phil ever sit down and think is all this really worth it? What is the point of making all this money just to have to pay it all out to crisis management, injunctions and god knows whoever else? When everyone knows the truth anyway?
No. In a word.I wonder does Phil ever sit down and think is all this really worth it? What is the point of making all this money just to have to pay it all out to crisis management, injunctions and god knows whoever else? When everyone knows the truth anyway?
YES! The bottom line is that Phil knew his brother was molesting a kid and didn’t report it, then only when it became public did he say ‘I no longer have a brother’.That GB news panel seems like a right bunch of pillocks. Why would you be outraged that he disowned his brother? Fair enough pointing out it's a careerist move and if that's what they were moaning about I'd understand but their main point of contention seemed to be him saying he had disowned his pweirdo brother.
That guy on the end was like "That tells me more about Phil than his brother." duck off. I love my brother to bits but if he'd done something like that he'd be dead to me.
"Thanks for all the fun originally though"Interesting timing for philth to quit Twitter? His last tweet was around the time his brother spoke to him (i think). If he knew the story was going to come out, could be be calculating enough to realise he'd not want his words forever tied to a shady timeline of sordid secrets and shame?
I absolutely agree with you. I thought it was a good slot, they discussed the only thing they were able to - Philth's statement about his brother, but clearly alluding to the fact that there's a lot about Philth they can't discuss. We aren't the only ones who are worried about his past activities, it's everywhere on social media, many many people will have watched that and it would have made them think that there is so much that can't be said. I think the lid of the can of worms may just have lifted a fraction. At least GB News have alluded to it, within their legal responsibilities, which is a damn sight more than any of the main, corrupt channels have done.I think they are using that element of Philths statement to dig deeper into the debate about Philth, I don't think that is their main issue with Phillip Schofield,it's quite clever really, we know that's not what they mean, they know that's not what they mean and Phillip Schofield knows full well that's not what they mean! And as for Calvin, he may not be everyones cup of tea but he has likely challenged many people's thoughts about PS with his comments last night which can be nothing but a good thing
Bet that wasn't all Tim told him, but that's all Philth told the police, otherwise he could have been more heavily implicated. And Tim couldn't say otherwise because he pleaded not guilty. I reckon they discussed everything and that Tim felt safe saying it to Philth because he knew Philth had done exactly the same.That is what Phil told the police Tim told him in his statement. It was just once, the boy was over the age of consent, they were pleasuring themselves and not each other
I think it's more what Calvin alluded to rather than what they did say. They couldn't take a hard line stance and spill the beans because there is an injunction. I think, Calvin's expressions and throw away comments gave away how much more they knew. They only discussed the statement because its the only thing they could discuss without landing themselves in it. But didn't stop them putting a little spin on it!OK in what way is their main problem being him disowning his disgusting brother digging deeper? Not trying to be snarky but a few people have said this as if there's some deeper message.
All I can see is from the panel is people repeating that "blood is thicker than water" crap and essentially saying its too harsh to disown a paedophile if you are related to them. I gather the bloke is a reverend so maybe it's a god thing. I dunno. I disagree with it and having never watched GB news I was hoping for more of a hard line stance from them.
I never thought that video would end
Just seen this on tiktok.
Another big ITV starWasn't that Michael Barrymore?
I'm not going to keep banging on about it because I don't want to derail the thread. I guess having not watched GB News I just expected a bit more from its rep.I think it's more what Calvin alluded to rather than what they did say. They couldn't take a hard line stance and spill the beans because there is an injunction. I think, Calvin's expressions and throw away comments gave away how much more they knew. They only discussed the statement because its the only thing they could discuss without landing themselves in it. But didn't stop them putting a little spin on it!