Pleased to see GBNews have been covering the story. Whilst I think the angle they went in on Schofield with was quite gross, by making out it was immoral for Schofield to disown his brother for his paedophilic antics I kind of see what they were doing. Dan was trying to underhandedly highlight Philth’s hypocrisy without creating an legal issues - Disowning his brother whilst he’s committing acts of a similar vein.
Calvin more or less confirmed there’s some form of NDA or super-injunction in place. I wonder if any journalists have been reading here and listening to our complaints regarding the coverage of this particular news story and GB News had legal consultations to ensure they could discuss the story and remain critical of Phil without landing themselves in lawsuit territory?
Also, I had a look on the This Morning thread on DS, purely out of curiosity to see if they were any people who had the same opinion as us regarding Philth, and as I predicted, the place is awash with Schofield sympathisers. So if anyone has an account on there, please ask JurassicMark why he’s so hellbent on defending someone whose widely disliked across the industry, and if Schofe is such a good person, why did he file past the queen’s coffin and why did he provide a character reference for a young sex worker who lives with him who was in court under suspicion for revenge porn?