Gosh she really is a vile woman who believes her own hype. Sad sad ladyI really don’t buy the whole people sent me screenshots. It’s clear R is on here
Gosh she really is a vile woman who believes her own hype. Sad sad ladyI really don’t buy the whole people sent me screenshots. It’s clear R is on here
Of course it's possible to block an email address you bleeping spoon so bloody defensive, if you hadn't done anything wrong in the first place love you wouldn't have anything to worry about now would you?I really don’t buy the whole people sent me screenshots. It’s clear R is on here
I doubt anyone has sent her abuseIt won’t be current tattle users sending her abuse - if they are it will be people who have actually just read this thread or maybe other people asking why she’s suddenly replied to you after 6 months of people asking and also she knew this thread was going and she’s actually been on this thread, she could have answered months ago.
I really don’t buy the whole people sent me screenshots. It’s clear R is on here
In all honesty I don’t think it’s screen shots. She’s admitted herself she reads here. The only children discussions I’ve see here are safeguarding issues. She is an ambassador for Kidscape yet often films the children without their knowledge, their text messages etc and then she uploads them. Issac has already been taunted at school in the past because of her and what she shows. Now they all know he had his first spot the other day and his step sister was squeezing it ! Now he may not care or he may be mortified by that - who knowsI do actually feel a bit sorry for her, if she’s being sent screenshots and other messages that’s not on. Tattle can be quite nasty and if she’s not reading on here herself, it’s not fair that she’s being made to see the more unkind comments.
We all have questions about her morals and how things don’t add up and I think they’re legitimate enough to discuss on a forum. I don’t think making fun of her name, discussing her children (when it’s not about safeguarding concerns) or name calling is needed to be honest, it makes the real concerns and discussions seem false and as if we’re all ‘haters’. I hope that makes sense?
He wouldn’t even know he was being filmed until one of his mates mentioned it - mortifying!In all honesty I don’t think it’s screen shots. She’s admitted herself she reads here. The only children discussions I’ve see here are safeguarding issues. She is an ambassador for Kidscape yet often films the children without their knowledge, their text messages etc and then she uploads them. Issac has already been taunted at school in the past because of her and what she shows. Now they all know he had his first spot the other day and his step sister was squeezing it ! Now he may not care or he may be mortified by that - who knows
that’s what I think - most people on here are very articulate. It’s probably either lies or someone who’s just been following the thread - or MOD (joke)The whole thing is just a shitstorm waiting to happen. She reads here, that much is obvious and has been for a while. They all do it. Hinch gets most of her content from her thread on here these days. It’s almost as bad as us posting here regularly, she’ll want to know what’s being said (now more than ever after the MoD thing).
The thing is, it’s not going to die down. More people are waking up to this influencer bullshit and flocking to sites like this to vent about it. You can’t blame them when any doubts about these people’s intentions lead to being silenced via blocking or REAL trolling from obsessed fans. I wouldn’t like to think people from here have been hurling abuse at anyone’s inbox or stalking/harassing (that’s seriously fucked up), from what I’ve read most people just want answers. Concrete answers. Not some contrived, vague rubbish that took half an hour to draft up on your notes app.
Edited to add that I was replying to her email replies that were above this comment.I really don’t buy the whole people sent me screenshots. It’s clear R is on here
Oh, come on Primrose. She hasn’t been sent any nasty messages. She’s been keeping an eye on here whilst doing the night feeds. No one has emailed her.I do actually feel a bit sorry for her, if she’s being sent screenshots and other messages that’s not on. Tattle can be quite nasty and if she’s not reading on here herself, it’s not fair that she’s being made to see the more unkind comments.
We all have questions about her morals and how things don’t add up and I think they’re legitimate enough to discuss on a forum. I don’t think making fun of her name, discussing her children (when it’s not about safeguarding concerns) or name calling is needed to be honest, it makes the real concerns and discussions seem false and as if we’re all ‘haters’. I hope that makes sense?
The freedom facilitator training bit scared the crap out of me too. She is miles away from the ethos and beliefs of the trainers I knowThat ‘newsletter’ should have been a Word or PDF format, not an email with terrible grammar. It looked like something written hurriedly over the weekend. I agree that Jo is just as bad and I assume she’s on the pay-roll, hence her wanting to cover her tracks too.
Whenever someone has asked where their donations have gone to, they’ve been blocked and accused of being trolls. Since the recent event with Clemmie, PTWM has been replying to donators and giving them a ‘newsletter’ breakdown. But why since June?
Where have funds been spent since 2017? She wasn’t pregnant then and could have employed a treasurer to keep correct accounts. It’s a mess, sorry.
You don’t need money to signpost people; if someone tells you they’re struggling with debt and you’ve told them to visit the local CAB office - that’s signposting.
How has she had access to 24 referrals? What’s this 24 referrals have been signposted nonsense? Who were they referred to?
And do landlords or estate agents actually contact PTWM if a tenant is in trouble with gas and electric? They wouldn’t over here? And did PTWM just give this lady money to pay the debt - or did they contact the energy provider and set up a payment plan/apply for the Warm Home Discount?
Why has a woman in refuge been given £60 for milk and food? Refuges have petty cash for food because the women are in their care - if not, they refer to food banks. It’s easy to say ‘woman in refuge’ - it could be all over the UK and no one asks where because of the anonymity.
I hate that I’m so critical, but I don’t believe this is genuine.
And I seriously have concerns about her becoming a trained Freedom Programme facilitator; she cannot he trusted to not discuss her service users’ stories online. She will cry and make a big fuss, when the women do not want sympathy. They want to be empowered and given the skills to understand healthy relationships and recognise signs of abuse.
Do I want a woman to run this course when she sercretly films her husband? No. No I don’t.