Paging Mr Morrow #2 fedorable or deplorable?

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
$5/1000 views
That makes me wish I lived in Orlando so I could be one of the assholes with a camera. I'd give you guys some stupid tit to talk about everyday. :)

The niche that I've been a part of, 1000 views would be considered "viral". It's so sad.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 2
That makes me wish I lived in Orlando so I could be one of the assholes with a camera. I'd give you guys some stupid tit to talk about everyday. :)

The niche that I've been a part of, 1000 views would be considered "viral". It's so sad.
And Adam shows us the inside of an airport and he gets 80k views. 🤦🏻‍♀️
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 4
From past comments, either the credit card was through lender that targets people with poor credit or was sold to a company that buys bad debts. Thus they may have a little more incentive to try to collect.
I wouldn't think that matters at this point, though.

When the bill was still current, he could have easily put a good dent in that bill with the money he spends on 3-5 big sit-down w/ tip meals at Disney, and had it paid off - at the most - in a matter of months.

It didn't need to go to collections. You can typically call a CC company and try and negotiate a lower APR to pay it down faster, or if that doesn't work bc of the type of card you have, even try and negotiate a lower balance to clear it up. And if that doesn't work, once you go to collections, you can usually try and negotiate a lower balance if you're, again, willing to give them some money.

Not saying it always happens, but you have to show good faith in contacting them.

Unfortunately, I have experience in this area due to a bad first marriage / divorce where I was saddled with tens of thousands of debt (I'm talking $50,000+) and ended up having to go Chapter 7 in my late 20s.

$900 is nothing.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3
And Adam shows us the inside of an airport and he gets 80k views. 🤦🏻‍♀️
And I'm first in line to watch every second of it. LOL

Unfortunately, I have experience in this area due to a bad first marriage / divorce where I was saddled with tens of thousands of debt (I'm talking $50,000+) and ended up having to go Chapter 7 in my late 20s.
We could trade war stories. LOL It's a learning experience. You learn where you never want to be again.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: 3
I wouldn't think that matters at this point, though.

When the bill was still current, he could have easily put a good dent in that bill with the money he spends on 3-5 big sit-down w/ tip meals at Disney, and had it paid off - at the most - in a matter of months.

It didn't need to go to collections. You can typically call a CC company and try and negotiate a lower APR to pay it down faster, or if that doesn't work bc of the type of card you have, even try and negotiate a lower balance to clear it up. And if that doesn't work, once you go to collections, you can usually try and negotiate a lower balance if you're, again, willing to give them some money.

Not saying it always happens, but you have to show good faith in contacting them.

Unfortunately, I have experience in this area due to a bad first marriage / divorce where I was saddled with tens of thousands of debt (I'm talking $50,000+) and ended up having to go Chapter 7 in my late 20s.

$900 is nothing.
Perhaps it was joint credit and it had V's name and address as primary and contact. Perhaps he didn't even get notified of default until the debt was sold. I agree, he should have been able to easy negotiate a payment or just paid the amount in full once he knew of its existence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
I would agree and this is the reason that Disney and these companies give them "media access". It helps Disney control the narrative. Is someone really going to talk smack about a company that is giving them free stuff and special access? Not really. So by Disney giving them the access, they help control what is said about them. Even if the vlogger says something negative, they usually spin it in a way to not make the company look all that bad.
Sooo Pete from Disunplugged is never invited then.
Although he still rants about it in the Dis. I understand Disney's side but it wouldn't change people's minds if something is terrible or not worth it or expensive. I think they are making regular guests fed up by the dates and hypocrisy look at the skyliner preview.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps it was joint credit and it had V's name and address as primary and contact. Perhaps he didn't even get notified of default until the debt was sold. I agree, he should have been able to easy negotiate a payment or just paid the amount in full once he knew of its existence.
If V. is primary, then she'd be saddled w/ the CC bill.

If he was just an additional cardholder / authorized user, the primary cardholder is still responsible for the bill.

That would mean V. would, again, be responsible for it.

Edited to add: I doubt a CC type like this would be a joint credit issue, but if it were, they'd both be named in the court docs. And if that were the case, it'd be even more stupid since I saw an Dec 2019 IG pic of her with a Porsche SUV captioned "hard work pays off."
If she could buy that, she could pay $900.
 
More updates to my tea....Nate isn't permanently blacklisted. The media team DOES like him because he isn't pushy and doesn't give away crappy tips. They just don't want to work with him for right now.
 
  • Like
  • Sick
  • Wow
Reactions: 5
Ugh. This bleeping mole. Latest vlog, PMM buys another fedora. It was more expensive than he thought, but maybe he just checked his PO Box and is using some gift cards.

He can't pay off his credit card. He can't pay for things his mom wanted while she was here. But he can buy another fedora and eat another huge steak to add to the clogging of his arteries. Ridiculous.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 3
More updates to my tea....Nate isn't permanently blacklisted. The media team DOES like him because he isn't pushy and doesn't give away crappy tips. They just don't want to work with him for right now.
This is GREAT! I don't wish for him losing something vlogger related to be cruel, just is good for him to have a some kind of "no" when it comes to the way he vlogs. It's not family friendly to drink before a ride and buy document fedoras only and then go cheap route on an AP Preview and treat his mom like that. If he can tell his own mom no or Veronica (if it is real) then it's good he gets a "no" and no better than from Disney itself!
 
I need to catch up, what’s this with TTT? And has PMM lost media confirmed?
@apojacks just answered the PMM tea 2 comments above yours.

The TTT is way too involved for a TLDR (keeps evolving LOL). Check out the last TTT thread. The stuff started about 5-6 days ago from the point of their last livestream until now.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 2
This is GREAT! I don't wish for him be permanently to be cruel, just is good for him to have a some no's when it comes to the way he vlogs. It's not family friendly to drink before a ride and buy document fedoras only and then go cheap route on AP Preview Dining and treat his mom like that.
Basically what I was just told is that they really don’t want to work with people who are going to make their living off of vlogging. They really want to work with people who are relatable…you know people who have jobs and vlog for fun.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 4
Basically what I was just told is that they really don’t want to work with people who are going to make their living off of vlogging. They really want to work with people who are relatable…you know people who have jobs and vlog for fun.
As much as you know I cannot really stand any vloggers (entitled, whining, brats as 99% of them are), if this were true - and how the company wants to move forward - I could (almost) be OK with this. ;)
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 4
Basically what I was just told is that they really don’t want to work with people who are going to make their living off of vlogging. They really want to work with people who are relatable…you know people who have jobs and vlog for fun.
I'm sitting here giggling at the "pro" vloggers.

I'd love to see a variety of people picked. Young, old, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
As much as you know I cannot really stand any vloggers (entitled, whining, brats as 99% of them are), if this were true - and how the company wants to move forward - I could be OK (almost) with this. ;)
The person I am talking to about this has also seen the Vlogs I did over the summer for my RunDisney training and they’re interested in connecting to chat with me about my vlog as long as I promise I am not going to make a living off of it. Which would be kinda hard since I live in the midwest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Basically what I was just told is that they really don’t want to work with people who are going to make their living off of vlogging. They really want to work with people who are relatable…you know people who have jobs and vlog for fun.
Good info, I wonder if that's why PCD made the comment of I don't need YouTube to make money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Good info, I wonder if that's why PCD made the comment of I don't need YouTube to make money.
Probably. I think the Mouse is sick of their tit in general. The intel I am getting right now is telling me that if you go in humble and be nice, you will get a lot further. BBBrooke is on the permanent exclusion list too because of 1) giving Tim her plus one to HEA, and 2) all of the copyrighted merch she’s selling on her website, which coincidentally is down while she celebrates her nuptials. Doubt there coming back
 
  • Heart
Reactions: 1
Basically what I was just told is that they really don’t want to work with people who are going to make their living off of vlogging. They really want to work with people who are relatable…you know people who have jobs and vlog for fun.
OMG!!!!!!!!!!! 🤣 :)


Basically what I was just told is that they really don’t want to work with people who are going to make their living off of vlogging. They really want to work with people who are relatable…you know people who have jobs and vlog for fun.
This makes a lot of sense. It's already not right vloggers do practically nothing to help others can make a living by the $$$$ while other's who can do the same don't. However to use "Disney" especially to get the benefits and telling people Disney invited them is disgusting because most aren't fans of Disney otherwise if they were they would be obeying Disney and doing the right thing when it comes to respecting Disney and viewer audiences.
 
Last edited:
I know a lot of companies are more keen to work with "micro influencers', so it makes sense if Disney is going this route.

I know a lot of people who watch TTT also watch PMM, SE, MK, etc. But if Disney starts focusing on smaller influencers they may find people they haven't reached yet. Smaller influencers typically have more die hard fans that will listen to their recommendations. Whether they're on the media list or not, these 'full time vloggers' are going to vlog any little changes that Disney does because they're starved for new content.

Thanks for all the tea @apojacks
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.