Which is one theory I read that she was hit by the dog went in head first its a high bank so no slip marks and I read the water was higher than it was now.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I thought the same, he’s definitely had it done within the last week.Really? With his face full of fresh botox and filler?
Dan Walker mentioned that Paul and Nicola had plans to get married during lockdown and asked if they would get married when she is found. Completely unnecessary and hurtful in my opinion.
Not meaning this as a question to you but in general (and in agreement with @Jwren post just after this one) -
If it’s only 3ft deep, why did they need to send divers in?
The one thing that makes me think she could’ve been followed and attacked is that she tracked her walks ( and I think they were public ) and it has been noted a creep has been liking all her pictures/following her on Strava. Absolutely terrifying.
Ring doorbells are not concrete evidence. When the battery is low they don’t always pick up every movement.
You can wave a hand in front of it then run out it doesn’t ‘reset’ quick enough to pick you up… and yes we’ve tried it
Do they have a back entrance?
They asked him about plans to marry, they hadn't got round to it. They asked when she's back home will you?
He said in the interview he works for an American company so because of the time difference he doesn’t start work until 10am and he enjoys that hour alone
Only 3ft deep at the entry point near the bench. It’s not 3ft everywhere
The question didn’t come out of the blue
Yes sorry I realise that, but I mean initially when they thought she’d gone in by the bench and they sent divers in - they thought she would have still been in that area.Only 3ft deep at the entry point near the bench. It’s not 3ft everywhere
ETA I’m agreeing with you about it not making sense, except now I’m the one not making sense
What are you getting at? Setting him up to read his reaction
Entry point for NB could be literally anywhere, especially if you went hurtling off that steep edge and if there‘s an undercurrent you can soon be caught up in it however shallow and that’s assuming there wasn’t a deep hole where she entered.Only 3ft deep at the entry point near the bench. It’s not 3ft everywhere
Sorry if this has already been mentioned.
I was convinced she’s gone into the water until the interview with C5.
Looking back at history, Karen Matthews, Ian Huntley, Mick Philpott. All did television interviews proclaiming their innocence.
Do you think the police had some responsibility in setting this up to profile the husband’s body language?
Two weeks and still not found, water been checked extensively. Are the police now looking at other avenues?
I was convinced she’s gone into the water until the interview with C5.
Looking back at history, Karen Matthews, Ian Huntley, Mick Philpott. All did television interviews proclaiming their innocence.
Do you think the police had some responsibility in setting this up to profile the husband’s body language?
Two weeks and still not found, water been checked extensively. Are the police now looking at other avenues?
A lot of people seem to think the husband is dodgy, but if it has been established that he isn’t a suspect, he has a solid alibi backed up by CCTV, then what part do people think that he played in her disappearance? That he paid someone else to do it?
Didn't they say that the divers were searching the shallow reeded parts and the sonar was searching the deeper parts. Looking at some of the footage, the divers were also covering the deeper parts.
I know we're not Peter fans, but he was right when he said that these divers can find dumped knives in murky water, so I'm with him in that after all the searches they'd have found her, or something that belonged to her
Re the marriage question, I think it is likely Dan and Paul discussed which questions would be asked before they started filming the interview.
How would Dan know Paul and Nicola had spoken about marriage previously otherwise? He had to have been told prior to the interview.
How would Dan know Paul and Nicola had spoken about marriage previously otherwise? He had to have been told prior to the interview.
Surely if the husband was involved somehow he’d be pushing the ‘fallen in the river’ story whereas he’s saying he doesn’t believe she’s in there.
I am so sorry if this has been asked earlier - I have missed out a few pages so could have missed it. Please don’t should shout at me:
I’m just watching the programme now and until now I’d thought that the sighting was from a person on the upper field who saw Nicola walking along the river path. But they phrased it as if Nicola was actually IN the upper field as they then said that the phone records show that the phone was then back by the river in the vicinity of the bench. If I have understood that correctly, doesn’t that mean that something could have happened in the fields and the phone has been planted back there?
I’m just watching the programme now and until now I’d thought that the sighting was from a person on the upper field who saw Nicola walking along the river path. But they phrased it as if Nicola was actually IN the upper field as they then said that the phone records show that the phone was then back by the river in the vicinity of the bench. If I have understood that correctly, doesn’t that mean that something could have happened in the fields and the phone has been planted back there?
100% this! Totally agree with you.
- Status