TwooTwooTwitTwitTwoo
VIP Member
Fair enoughI am!! I‘m not seeing what you’re all seeing
![Slightly smiling face :slight_smile: 🙂](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f642.png)
Fair enoughI am!! I‘m not seeing what you’re all seeing
These are dark shadows from a sunken eye areaHas the bruising to Paul Ansell's eye been brought into question?
Yes, that was one of the points I clocked it too.I felt this when he was asked what he wanted to say to Nikki. I don’t know I just feel really unnerved by the whole show
I don’t think my OH would worry if I wasn’t home at 11 after the school run. I’ll have to ask him!People do tend to just crack on with work and assume someone’s running late, it’s not like she was six hours late he probably just assumed she was chatting to someone or popped in the shop
That wasn’t what C5 was after or did the programme for though.I do think it was a wasted opportunity for them to give out the absolute facts of what they know happened that day, placement of items, sightings/times that put NB at various positions on her walk, cameras working and not etc.
Or he’s just not a very good interviewe.I can't help but think the guy interviewing him is trying to trip him up. I just have a really uneasy feeling about the whole thing. The programme is like a weird case study.
They did set up an email address, was that given out on the prog tonight?That was the only thing I agreed with MWT on, there should be a dedicated phone line for Nicola's case.
You’ve confused meHas Edward got a Partner/wife?
My husband said about Shannon Miles.I agree I've been getting this feeling
Ah yes, after he said there was no possibility she could have entered the river and the phone was a decoy.to be fair he did say that she wasn't in the parts of the area of the river his team had searched, however he didn't rule out that she may have entered the river at a different spot not searched
I genuinely don't know the undertone of this conversation. It was her friend that corrected the perception early on. If there was a problem between family members why would they all be at pains to say there wasn't. Surely it would be obvious by now if they didn't like the husband or something.I suppose they could be lying but what would be the point?
There’s no crime though so there’s no need for evidenceWould it be the same harness though? Would the actual one not have been kept by the police as evidence?
Think I had it on BBC today. The interviewer was Scottishwas her interview with GMTV?
Yeah I guess so, if it wasn’t normal for her to pop places then perhaps this would seem worrying enough to make 3 callsBut earlier in this very thread people were saying how odd it was that he hadn’t noticed she wasn’t back yet and why hadn’t he tried to get in touch with her.
it just goes show that everyone is different.
I was being facetiousYou’ve confused me![]()