And Peter AndreAnd the likes of people in the public eye like Emma Kenny wading in from the beginning.
And Peter AndreAnd the likes of people in the public eye like Emma Kenny wading in from the beginning.
Yes. The clues were there.I did think when her family gave their first press conference that it was rather strange that her husband wasnât part of it
Partner. Not husband.I did think when her family gave their first press conference that it was rather strange that her husband wasnât part of it
Yeah, I accept that. I didn't follow the case, as it didn't interest me, but I have seen a couple of programmes about it and your points are absolutely valid.Yes it was pretty important. Gabby being instagram famous helped for a start which meant people were reporting on the case. IIRC, the reason police knew Brian's journey home was because a girl on tiktok said she'd ran into him or something like that which meant police could verify that is he had been hitchhiking in that area.
There was a bunch of other stuff too that I can't remember but I followed it closely at the time because a YTer I watched covered it.
ETA: what I'm trying to get at is that the more people were talking about it the more people came forward with clues/info/footage etc but it was just a coincidence that it happened that way. They were travelling so it was already a bit mis matched and then it's a struggle for individual police forces to cross state lines and investigate so to speak. So she went missing in the midwest but was reported missing on the East coast. I'm probably not explaining it well but the reason the case was solved was because it was so wildly talked about across social media. Realistically, that couple wouldn't have known what to look for if it hadn't been for the SM coverage. It was a generic white van for the most part
Wait.....what?And Peter Andre
Wait.....what?
He just wonât go away!Faulding on LBC right now. This bloke has no shame.
To me it reads that he thinks she went away of her own accord.If Paul was the one who disclosed the vulnerabilities to the police, why is he so conflicted with the river theory? Doesnât make sense.
I agree with and I think that's the problem, because it did help in that case and it was a crowd sourced, now everyone seems to think every case is the same or really wants to be the person who cracked it. The Idaho murders was the same. Someone got arrested for defamation after accusing a completely innocent person (a professor I think) of the murder. It's really frustrating and I think the GP case fuelled the fireYeah, I accept that. I didn't follow the case, as it didn't interest me, but I have seen a couple of programmes about it and your points are absolutely valid.
Apologies - I let my personal irritation about social media "detectives" cloud my thinking.
Closure is needed. Questions with no answers lead to a lifetime of pain. I have read countless devastating stories of families of victims of murder who are never found. The pain is unimaginable. Although we may not get all the answers about what happened to Nicola, they will hopefully get her body home at least. Hopefully her 6 year old wonât remember much of these days. The older child will probably not be so lucky.I'm not saying this to be controversial, but I genuinely think it would be better for her kids in the long run if she was no longer alive, rather than having willingly abandoned them and done a disappearing act for whatever reason.
I have considered this whilst scrolling her Facebook a few days ago. I discounted it though because I feel like itâs always announced if a woman is missing and pregnant. Itâs not really a privacy thing if there is potentially an unborn child at risk.Regarding these vulnerabilities... could she be pregnant?
Not that strange when you consider that she doesnât have a husband!I did think when her family gave their first press conference that it was rather strange that her husband wasnât part of it
Maybe cause he doesn't think she did it that way. He could believe she's committed suicide but not like that maybe?If Paul was the one who disclosed the vulnerabilities to the police, why is he so conflicted with the river theory? Doesnât make sense.
Someone who had to look after the girls. I doubt the family would leave them with anyone, bearing in mind their mum had just gone missing. Or he may not have been up to speaking publicly?I did think when her family gave their first press conference that it was rather strange that her husband wasnât part of it
The world has gone mad.Nicola Bulley mystery: Singer Peter Andre comments on disappearance
Singer Peter Andre has waded into the mystery over missing mother-of-two Nicola Bulley - saying he 'can't imagine' what her distraught relatives are going through as they wait for news.www.dailymail.co.uk
The comments
Maybe he thinks it more likely that she'd leave/disappear rather than anything else?If Paul was the one who disclosed the vulnerabilities to the police, why is he so conflicted with the river theory? Doesnât make sense.