Nope, not a "her" problem.
In my line of work I see pix downloaded from websites such as fb and Instagram, children's heads superimposed onto other bodies and unimaginable things done to them.
In court last week I witnessed a man facing 42 charges of digitalisation of child images for sexual abuse. None of them were his own kids (he does have them, but used other people's.. )
Anyone who cares about their children will keep their images for close friends and family only (except in some cases family members like the person above are still a danger)
Now tell me I'm just miserable and it's a me problem. I wish I could explain how dangerous sharing images of children, I wish you could accompany me in my job just one day. You'd see then.
perverts aside… it’s basic respect.
children can’t consent to having their images in the public domain. Respect that a child isn’t able to understand or consent to their image being publicly available and offer them the basic decency of some privacy.
a child isn’t a toy to “show off” to the world because parents are “proud” of that child. They are individual people, and will one day be adults. Children should be afforded the basic courtesy of their privacy.
im not saying there should be zero images of kids online, but factoring in things like privacy settings, number of followers you have etc. and frequency and type of content being shared.
and using kids in sponsored ads or as a way to up engagement is shocking behaviour, terrible parenting and utterly selfish.