I agree Unsubscribed On LW, N is always going on about how schools should provide healthy meals (I agree) because some parents are feral / clueless but can't see her own failings. Sorry, yes she can see her own failings but laughs them off or turns them into phantom illnesses.Hmm not into verbally abusing the kids about their appearance. Harsh and uncalled for. Mark and Nadia should wake up, is the couple of hundred quid they earn from youtube worth their kids mental health? I definitely think a legislation needs to come in about kids being exploited on youtube and social media.
I read this during the week:
Why Did These YouTubers Give Away Their Son?
Myka and James Stauffer adopted a toddler from China and shared every step of the process with their online audience. Except the last.
www.thecut.com
'In the kindest light, Myka, now 33, and James, 35, were painted as well-meaning but naïve parents who had gotten in over their heads; in the harshest, they were fame-hungry narcissists who’d exploited a child for clicks and profit.'
Whilst this case is far more extreme than the Sadderleys', there are so many examples in the article that chime with the way N & M have gone about their 'family' YT channel at the expense of their children's right to grow up in privacy. The stuff where 'pedophiles were time-stamping scenes in videos as a virtual Bat-Signal to one another' reminded me of 11-12 year old KiKi's instagram account with 10,000s of followers, littered with likes from her parents as well as the way they film her (and her artwork) covertly.
The vulnerable position M & N have put their children in makes me want to vomit. And now they are away for the weekend again, taking a break from a life without responsibilities.