How old is the dog? Any breeder worth their salt advises a new owner to yelp at a puppy when it nips.
Lol, just noticed my typo.... GREEDER, instead of breeder.... But maybe it is more appropriate for our GrabeccaThink November? But the whole greeder/getting Bertie background story seemed a little dodgy.
Even if the breeder had advised that (and she claims to be on every bloody dog owner group), she'll know best... You can't tell her anything.
Yet she posts them all online, including her Facebook page, open to the public. Yet he's the one promoting Internet security.... couple of neeps!The girls aren’t allowed to watch youtube...... but are allowed to star in it and be plastered all over the internet for others to watch. Oh the irony.
She really is thick and thinks she’s protecting her kids by not allowing them to watch YouTube
That is desperately sad. I hope the family and particularly the teen get through this. That's terrifying.This is from an article in the Mail online from 2015.
View attachment 87173
She essentially admitted that their private life was 'for sale' and she was happy therefore to " breach her own privacy " but at that point Rebecca did have some concern for the girls but it seemed to centre on "criticism". No one on Tattle criticises the girls and I assume no one does that on her gram / feed etc either so perhaps that scenario has never arisen.
Two things struck me from this statement; one being that she recognised at this point that the vlogs were an "invasion or breach of privacy" but it was her privacy so that was ok. However, now it is her girls privacy.
The second being that she naively seemed to only perceive 'criticism' of the girls would affect her daughters and make her "think twice".
Yesterday I had a chance conversation with a Mum in our community that I have known for some time. Over the last 10 years she had lived out her life on facebook & instagram, not as a vlogger, influencer, business or public figure but as an individual who had her post privacy set to 'public' so all her daughters peers, friends, parents of friends etc could see them all. She has had an alternative lifestyle and her social filter is sometimes misplaced so she occasionally shared things that maybe would have been more appropriate with a 'friends only' setting but it was genuinely done without realising that it was 'out there' for all to see. Three years ago her daughter was diagnosed with anxiety and depression and last year at the age of 16 tried twice to take her own life.
Her daughters peer group had found the facebook page and Instagram hilarious and sufficiently full of cringeworthy content that could be used to taunt, mock and tease this girl. She was torn between loyalty to her Mum but desperately wanting to be 'normal', semi- anonymous and like so many teenagers, just fit in. Her confidence was so eroded she never knew when she saw some of her friends laughing whether they were laughing at her or not and she decided it would be easier not to be here.
Does Rebecca still intend to "think twice if her daughters are affected" as she stated in the press article, or take preventative action now before this happens. Everything she has put in the public domain that intrudes into their privacy has the potential to affect her girls and not by some "troll" living in a remote location criticising the girls in a comment online, but by her providing an incredible volume of content to the local peer group.
This last week Rebecca and Lee have called for laws against trolls as apparently they identify with celebrities. Many celebrities are actually very protective of their children's privacy only permitting photographs of them in very controlled environments and certainly do not feature them in 30 minute family vlogs on a regular basis or have multiple images of them issued daily via Insta stories. Potentially this is a ticking bomb.
And with the new bypass road, accessing more beautiful parts of Aberdeenshire is so much easier now. She just doesn't explore further than 'her' woods.Catwoman so bloody true... She/ they aren't even adventurers in Scotland let alone say 20 miles radius of their home!! I know nothing about Scotland from their vlogs.. As a Midlander and past londoner!! The are the total opposite of adventurers if it's not gifted!! pathetic.. Show them a castle, Scottish heritage, explore nature/ glens that's not that bloody boring bloody wood..again. Those kids don't even do birdwatching or explore wildlife.
Such a fantastic post. So sorry for your freinds daughter hope it improves.This is from an article in the Mail online from 2015.
View attachment 87173
She essentially admitted that their private life was 'for sale' and she was happy therefore to " breach her own privacy " but at that point Rebecca did have some concern for the girls but it seemed to centre on "criticism". No one on Tattle criticises the girls and I assume no one does that on her gram / feed etc either so perhaps that scenario has never arisen.
Two things struck me from this statement; one being that she recognised at this point that the vlogs were an "invasion or breach of privacy" but it was her privacy so that was ok. However, now it is her girls privacy.
The second being that she naively seemed to only perceive 'criticism' of the girls would affect her daughters and make her "think twice".
Yesterday I had a chance conversation with a Mum in our community that I have known for some time. Over the last 10 years she had lived out her life on facebook & instagram, not as a vlogger, influencer, business or public figure but as an individual who had her post privacy set to 'public' so all her daughters peers, friends, parents of friends etc could see them all. She has had an alternative lifestyle and her social filter is sometimes misplaced so she occasionally shared things that maybe would have been more appropriate with a 'friends only' setting but it was genuinely done without realising that it was 'out there' for all to see. Three years ago her daughter was diagnosed with anxiety and depression and last year at the age of 16 tried twice to take her own life.
Her daughters peer group had found the facebook page and Instagram hilarious and sufficiently full of cringeworthy content that could be used to taunt, mock and tease this girl. She was torn between loyalty to her Mum but desperately wanting to be 'normal', semi- anonymous and like so many teenagers, just fit in. Her confidence was so eroded she never knew when she saw some of her friends laughing whether they were laughing at her or not and she decided it would be easier not to be here.
Does Rebecca still intend to "think twice if her daughters are affected" as she stated in the press article, or take preventative action now before this happens. Everything she has put in the public domain that intrudes into their privacy has the potential to affect her girls and not by some "troll" living in a remote location criticising the girls in a comment online, but by her providing an incredible volume of content to the local peer group.
This last week Rebecca and Lee have called for laws against trolls as apparently they identify with celebrities. Many celebrities are actually very protective of their children's privacy only permitting photographs of them in very controlled environments and certainly do not feature them in 30 minute family vlogs on a regular basis or have multiple images of them issued daily via Insta stories. Potentially this is a ticking bomb.
She did not. Pretty sure there is a blog about it. Or maybe it was on stories. But the jist of it is that her and Cath went to London, they BRIEFLY met CF and Andrew Brady (who they thought were super cute and loved up), Reb lost and they came home.I assume she didnt win!