See I know it says #ad but I still think needs say ad gifted. She should not be able get away with press sample/ press trips.
It's clear new cma rules not being implemented or enforced.
See I know it says #ad but I still think needs say ad gifted. She should not be able get away with press sample/ press trips.
They are an item she would never choose to buy she said few times in the past she defeats character clothing.Why is she covering half the shoe with her hand?
because deep down she knows theyāre f-ugly but is happy to have them coz theyāre frrreeeee!Why is she covering half the shoe with her hand?
She's using her kindly gifted nails to point Elsa out to the thick sheep who may not notice that the kindly gifted shoes are kindly gifted Frozen shoes.Why is she covering half the shoe with her hand?
Cos they are bloody ghastlyWhy is she covering half the shoe with her hand?
I followed her and was getting so tired of all the ads but the lying about DLP was the final straw for me I was already unsubscribed because of the whole Poppy fiasco never seen such blatant use of a baby for gain she was so unnatural with her and sadly since the big money dried up she has herself said many times that she regretted having a third ! If I had still been following her then her attitude towards Poppy would definitely have finished me off the racism row should have been the last straw for all her followers I think itās very sad that she is clawing her way back up of all the influencers i detest her the most for many reasons ! I am not a fan of mummy/family vloggers at all they are selling their childrens privacy and childhoods to the highest bidder and unfortunately to all those sick perverts out there who love to watch I donāt even share photos of my beautiful grandbairns anymore for this very reason the idea makes me feel ill they have all been made aware of the very real dangers and they still share well that says all I need to know about them !They really need some PR lessons when it comes to Dming 'her trolls'. Edgy to use the threat of police and lawyers (when as far as I am aware pointing out to brands the reasons why the influencer they are using may not be the right fit #lifegate isn't a crime) and Pat with his ridiculous I can see you emoji dms are missing a fantastic opportunity.
So hear is some free advise for the Meldrums. If you know the identity of someone who has made negative comments about your SM career you have two options:
1) Ignore it.
2) Rebecca should contact the person direct. No need for threats or getting your big boy, belter husband involved. Say you were upset/disappointed to know that they found they had to make such and such comment about then on a social media forum. If the comment was unture tell them so. Open up a dialogue with the person if Rebecca feels she really wants to express how the comment hurt her. You never know the person posting the comments may actually listen and re-think before they post again.
As been said many, many times I imagine nearly all of us once liked Mrs M and followed her. Somewhere along the line she has done something to alienate some of her followers. For me it was the lies at DLP so she either has to learn to suck it up and accept she will get negative comments, address why she has so many threads on a gossip column or if it is really is too much she can change her SM to private.
Iāve just been doing some reading, and a single message may constitute āmalicious communicationā.
It could be proved by some people that he has hunted them down simply because they disagree with his wife and discuss her on a public forum (nothing which hasnāt been going on for years) and the messages are designed to be threatening or menacing, ie. intimidating people that he knows who they are. He doesnāt know these people in real life, they donāt follow him, or communicate with him, so there is no reason he could give to justify contacting them. He needs to be careful.