The thing I don't get is, if you really hate what's being written about you, why read this site. I would completely understand if she was being trolled personally but that is not the case here. Its a forum of free speech and its a place she doesn't have to log into to read it, so why bother.
Also, though I'm not one who has complained to a brand or asa or cma, others are in their right to do so, the brand wouldn't take any action on gossip, only on hard cold facts. So, her being dropped has only a fraction to do with those people who have reported and making the m aware of her history (and if the companies did a proper background check, she probably wouldn't have been given the ads anyway) it's her past issues and the way these have been handled that is the reason she has been dropped. No one else's but hers and Lee's.
I would feel sorry for her if she had apologised properly and had learned from her many mistakes and people still complained to brands, but she hasn't done so, she's just continued to be shady, case in point the cinema ad - the whole caboodle.
Also, her naming Kermit, is bleeping horrendous. Kermit has done nothing but give constructive criticism.
Sorry for the essay, I hope it made sense.