Good pointUnless mrs m was using nail lady's ig to test the waters?
Good pointUnless mrs m was using nail lady's ig to test the waters?
She's purposely done this. None of the previous posts include customer's jewellery. She obviously is begging for recognition... On her own channel she's always takes pics 'coincidentally' flashing her rings - it's so embarrassing - the truly wealthy are so much more modest with possessions, such new money, working class attitude. It literally makes my joints hurt with cringe for her.
Mrs m isn't tagged but all rings in pic are hers!
That is a 4 stone and they look like brilliant cuts...itās not antique?! Old jewellery isnāt necessarily of any value...Well the 3 stone ring looks like it's an antique by the cut. They are not a recent style. I have earnings from 1890. And diamond Jewellery from other eras.
Everyone on here seems to think she has wealth patents and a privileged childhood. Now she's working class?She's purposely done this. None of the previous posts include customer's jewellery. She obviously is begging for recognition... On her own channel she's always takes pics 'coincidentally' flashing her rings - it's so embarrassing - the truly wealthy are so much more modest with possessions, such new money, working class attitude. It literally makes my joints hurt with cringe for her.
She does! I really noticed it in the gender reveal video for poppy. When they found out it was a girl all her attention went to Florrie immediately, āwhat do you think florrieā āare you excited florrieā meanwhile S was just standing there being excited to herself. Made me sad.Does anyone else think Mrs M totally ignore her eldest child? Everything else is about Florrie or Poppy she barely even mentions Safaiyah(so?) and if she does sheās very rude about her. Makes me cringe. God knows how sheāll make a come back I used to like her but sheās become so so snobby itās awful to watch.
It is if it's diamonds. Ask my insurers.That is a 4 stone and they look like brilliant cuts...itās not antique?! Old jewellery isnāt necessarily of any value...
Itās all the cut, colour and clarity and ct weight obviously
Only if theyāre decent diamonds... the age doesnāt strictly come into it. There are new rings which have huge value too and some that wouldnāt highly included and poor colour diamonds...It is if it's diamonds. Ask my insurers.
All I'm saying is you can tell by the cut if they are new.Only if theyāre decent diamonds... the age doesnāt strictly come into it. There are new rings which have huge value too and some that wouldnāt highly included and poor colour diamonds...
Oh I actually love that ring! I look at it every time I watch her.I feel a bit sad now, my 4 daughter got me the same Monica Vinader ring for Christmas, she chose it herself..
I donāt think youāre right it looks like 4 standard brilliant cut diamondsAll I'm saying is you can tell by the cut if they are new.
Sorry! It was my faultCrikey the diamond chat is reminding me of the home ownership chat
Sheās not bothered about [PO]colour either....Thereās only one āCā that describes them.
And it aināt Clarity.
The nails were arguably more exciting than her rings....Stopped everyone going on about nails.
And possibly more expensive........The nails were arguably more exciting than her rings....
If sheād actually paid!And possibly more expensive........