Money is her passion
Mrs Hinch #43 Nearly forgot to give it a mention, swipe up to pay for my extension
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Mrs Hinch Threads Wiki
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
It's obvs some sort of PR exercise suggested by herself or Gleam.She strikes me as being very confident, even hiding behind a filter.
Whatâs the point in her doing a Q&A when itâs all bullshit, I just donât get it
Also the Q + A boxes and their replies... (whether used or not) will have massively increased engagement on her account.
Oh I can't see this being answered but hope it is
One night after one to many ciders I have to admit, I sent a message to her and asked the same question. Obviously I forgot about my drunken outburst to her the next morning, so I was was shocked as hell to receive a reply from her. She states that bit is actually from a film. However, she didn't confirm what film
Thats the first thing I thought when she said she was doing a Q + A .......its to get her engagement figures up again!
But maybe if they did work with these instagrammers, then the rules would be clearer and they would understand more whatâs expected of them.
My sister runs a business on insta and the ASA are a nitemare! They talk in riddles and you canât get a straight answer out of them. They constantly say âthe rules are as writtenâ but everyone interprets the written word differently
My sister was gifted an outfit from another business for her daughter. She posted and thanked the company at the time and marked the post as #gifted. A few weeks later she put up a picture of her daughter, then realised her daughter was wearing the gifted outfit in the picture.
She didnât know if she also needed to mark the new post as #gifted as the outfit was in it, but decided not to as the new post was nothing to do with the company that gifted the outfit, her DD just happened to be wearing it. Her comments then blew up from people saying she should have marked it as gifted, and other people defending her saying she didnât have to. Who is right? We couldnât find any ârules are as writtenâ from the ASA and they were absolute NO help
The rules are not clear! Itâs like they (and people who report things to them
) are purposely trying to catch people out
Why wouldnât people report if influencers are deliberately misleading followers ? The rules are there for a reason so if people are following them they have nothing to worry about. I guess if In doubt and the item is gifted and you mention the company then it needs to be tagged. People like Mrs Hinch have management who keep her right so she has no excuse. If ASA need to make rules simpler for influencers to understand . Mrs Hinch should not have a hand in that . It should be done by independent people who have no ulterior motive .But maybe if they did work with these instagrammers, then the rules would be clearer and they would understand more whatâs expected of them.
My sister runs a business on insta and the ASA are a nitemare! They talk in riddles and you canât get a straight answer out of them. They constantly say âthe rules are as writtenâ but everyone interprets the written word differently
My sister was gifted an outfit from another business for her daughter. She posted and thanked the company at the time and marked the post as #gifted. A few weeks later she put up a picture of her daughter, then realised her daughter was wearing the gifted outfit in the picture.
She didnât know if she also needed to mark the new post as #gifted as the outfit was in it, but decided not to as the new post was nothing to do with the company that gifted the outfit, her DD just happened to be wearing it. Her comments then blew up from people saying she should have marked it as gifted, and other people defending her saying she didnât have to. Who is right? We couldnât find any ârules are as writtenâ from the ASA and they were absolute NO help
The rules are not clear! Itâs like they (and people who report things to them
Last edited:
V clever Grinch. Sheâll probs work with them and make even more money now!! Conniving.
Well Iâm not blocked 
If she's losing followers and has to buy those fake ones maybe she's stopped blocking now
Re Q&A the lost contrived exercise I have seen in a long time .... surely all her followers have sussed she made those questions up herself.
God forgive me but I don't believe for one minute she breast fed that child for 5 weeks ... 5 minutes more like
God forgive me but I don't believe for one minute she breast fed that child for 5 weeks ... 5 minutes more like
"I'm no Interior Designer" - yeah well we know that Soph which is why you do everything in grey as even a toddler could pick out grey things that would "match". Your do have skills but they are not ones you like to shout about - pulling the wool over people's eyes, gaslighting, playing the anxiety card, fleecing vulnerable people .... shall I go on?
She had a perfect prep machine set up ready to go pre birth, thereâs no way she was planning to breastfeed
We all know those were not the questions she was asked . How funny that they managed to cover all the topics we chat about on here . If she choose the real questions it would all be about stains on sofas and her favourite products etc cause thatâs why people follow her for cleaning .
Agreed
Thatâs the thing tho. A lot of the time people arenât âpurposely misleading followersâ the rules at just so unclear, and so contradictory that a lot of the time they canât do right for doing wrong.
Hinch is actually a perfect example. I believe she works for P&G? She also films in her home. So should every single P&G product in her home that she happens to catch on camera as she walks past it then be labelled as paid ad because she works for them. Even when she isnât being paid to promote that item and it just happens to be something she uses? I saw people moaning about Colgate toothpaste?
My sister did a paid promotion with a company, then a few weeks later she posted a completely unrelated video taken in her studio and one of the products she had done the ad for was in the background of one of the shots as she walked past it (itâs something she uses daily so there are lots of them around in her work space). She was reported by people for not declaring the unrelated video as an ad (even when it wasnât) because a product she had previously advertised made a 3 second appearance in the back ground of a video.
Itâs not clear!
I mean she got rid of it anyway and doesnât look like sheâs having another
no sense is madeSomeone posted on here a while ago all the rules regarding #ad #gifted etc and it seemed quite straightforward to me
If you are are paid to promote an item or gifted an item then for the next 12 months if you that item is shown on your grid/stories it has to be labelled #ad or #gifted even if you havent been paid for that actual post
Iâll see if I can find the screenshot for you and you can show your sister. Might make it easier to understand for the future
- Status