yeah from an admin perspective I’ve got no idea how the press maintain the list of which kids they can / can’t show publicly? But basically anyone thoroughly rich and famous who doesn’t need to flog the kids has chosen for their faces to be blurred, you see it on the daily mail all the time. I think Jude Law’s younger kids are blurred but the older ones aren’t as they’re all aspiring ~models aren’t they, also I think very possibly now over 18?
I’m seeing more and more influencers opt to hide their kids faces, and a lot of them do it really well? Like not just an emoji over the face but the composition of the shot makes sense with the back of a head or a slight side profile, so you can see the lovely family moment but the kid’s privacy is still protected.
Especially now, it’s quite tacky seeing pages and pages of staged kid shots, like those pageant moms in the USA
There is no difference Darlene putting those fake pageant teeth and bundles of fake hair in her mini me and making her strut about in heels in front of a room of pre register sex offenders for a couple of grand & FOD uploading bath time pics of the kids for a Miele