I absolutely love the fall from grace, #gifted designer cakes a diy job welcome to the real world!
I was exactly thinking this. Obviously I'm sure at home they all get equally fussed over, but online it's as if he just has the twins. I know the older girls don't wish to be featured anymore, but it still looks odd in B&w just doing huge birthday shout outs for the twins! He could do similar gushy birthday posts for the others girls without showing a photo of them, just to keep it all equal should they ever have a look etcdoesn’t appear as if the older girls get birthday shout outs, did they used to? How cut throat, even Kris Jenner gives the non work horse children (the boy, forgot his name) birthday posts!
Yep. I flinched and twitched all the way through tbh. He’s raising strong girls though.I've always noticed this too. Often even when it's not a blatant example (of which there are many), there's something that just seems "off".
When he uses his daughters for content, I always ask myself "would he be doing (or saying) this, if the child were a boy?" Did anyone else flinch at "your sole purpose in life is to collect as many smiles as possible"?
They even have jumpers to prove it.Yep. I flinched and twitched all the way through tbh. He’s raising strong girls though.
Such a twee Thing to say though.I’m not a fan of his AT ALL but I think the collecting smiles was a reference to their age and innocence, not their gender.
I'm not convinced he would have used the same phrasing for twin boys, but irrespective of their sex or gender I don't believe any child's "sole purpose in life" at any age is "collecting smiles". Children have far more value and purpose than that, in my opinion. If someone said that about a child of mine they'd be getting the raised eyebrow for sureI’m not a fan of his AT ALL but I think the collecting smiles was a reference to their age and innocence, not their gender.
It’s free fall. Maybe the bots are being deleted. I reported a few. Vicious things.Wasn’t Sunday the big sub 1 mil day? He’s averaging -1k users odd a day here
They probably offended his army of Utah mormon mommiesIt’s free fall. Maybe the bots are being deleted. I reported a few. Vicious things.
Or maybe FOD is having a purge. “Quick Clemmie, we need to delete some of the bots we bought. The Tattlers are onto us!”
And maybe his sex ed stories offended some of his foreign followers.
Yeah IA. I think an account that size will naturally be gaining followers from appearances in explore pages / ppl tagging friends / etc but for him that wasn’t enough growth to outpace the mass exodus. Now I’d guess that he’s seeing even less growth so the net decline is steeper, as time goes on and his content is viewed & interacted with less he’ll fall victim to the algorithm and it’ll get progressively steeper and steeper / enter the free fall.It’s free fall. Maybe the bots are being deleted. I reported a few. Vicious things.
Or maybe FOD is having a purge. “Quick Clemmie, we need to delete some of the bots we bought. The Tattlers are onto us!”
And maybe his sex ed stories offended some of his foreign followers.
MOD said on the MN threads that they would be stupid to rely on any income from IG and if everything fell through, they’d still be ok. I guess we’ll see (not that I would wish losing their house or anything like that on even that pair of twerps)Yeah IA. I think an account that size will naturally be gaining followers from appearances in explore pages / ppl tagging friends / etc but for him that wasn’t enough growth to outpace the mass exodus. Now I’d guess that he’s seeing even less growth so the net decline is steeper, as time goes on and his content is viewed & interacted with less he’ll fall victim to the algorithm and it’ll get progressively steeper and steeper / enter the free fall.
I genuinely wonder what they’re going to do? They have 4 kids on a single income, I know director sounds fancy but it’s not a technical role & big agencies tend to pay worse than boutiques/startups (risk money tbh and it’s always horrible chaos) so he’ll be on £80k odd I estimate? Which I appreciate isn’t awful - I’m not doing a question time on you - but not a lifestyle I’d want to be commuting from Ramsgate for? Tbh they need insta at this point so he’s going to keep trying to turn it around until something sticks. God as if the content can get any bleeping worse. Where are their agents?!
And a pat on the back from his mummy
Oh no I hope that didn’t come across as nasty as that wasn’t my intention, I certainly don’t want them to lose it all by any means as there are still 4 girls who don’t deserve to suffer at all. They actually deserve liberation from their working childhoods And tbh if you think about it, in the same way child actors have their funds preserved (I think parents are only allowed to take necessary care costs / essential expenses?) for them when they get into adulthood these insta starlets should have equal protection. They are the monetisable “product” and the money wouldn’t have been earnt without use of their image / person... so surely it’s theirs? I wonder what a media solicitor would say.MOD said on the MN threads that they would be stupid to rely on any income from IG and if everything fell through, they’d still be ok. I guess we’ll see (not that I would wish losing their house or anything like that on even that pair of twerps)
I work in an industry that uses a lot of agents, for both little names and bigger names, and it’s worth mentioning that unless you’re a proper celeb who has an all encompassing agent/press relations manager, they aren’t really expected to do much in these scenarios. They are there to put you forward for work, pitch your ideas to relevant organisations, negotiating deals and ensure you get paid. And that’s about it.Where are their agents?!