I agree- I totally understand not wanting your child to be online and not taking that from them but in the same breath don’t use them to flog goods... they don’t have a say in that either and in my opinion it’s worse. My only hope would be that they will put the money into a trust fund or something for her and not spend it themselves.Her current content involving Goldie is a lot like Fleur De Force when River was born. She only showed the baby when she was flogging clothing but not with the baby’s face, which is essentially what Megan is doing. I find it in quite poor taste really, either show the kid properly or don’t show her at all instead of just using her as a headless clothes horse. Liv on the other hand has got it spot on. I didn’t think she’d show Arlo but she’s being honest and real on her Instagram and people seem to really appreciate that, especially new mums.
This is great to hear. I still get the odd glance or remark and I think a lot of people still give more permission to famous people/media/bloggers as they’re ‘allowed’ to protect or limit their child‘s online presence for safety fears. I’d love to see this accepting attitude filtered for everyday families as just a choice without judgement.I think there can be a good balance of sharing your life more openly, not just ads, and including pictures of your kids (without showing their face). Angela Scanlon does this well where you still feel like she’s telling you stories about her kids which is sweet, but just omitting the face.
She shared her face in the first few weeks but after that she’s deliberately not, which is absolutely fine but now she’s flogging stuff using her kid and cropping out her face. It’s exploitation, when Goldie sees these pictures (which she will when she’s older) it’ll dawn on her that her mum used her as a clothes horse, not a nice feeling I would imagine.She has shared her face though?
Not a surprise she’s using her to sell stuff. But somehow draws the line at vlogging as it feels too personal. Imagine your morals not wanting to show your house but being completely
okay using your kid to sell stuff
Uh oh, I think faye is surpassing megan in the style ranks now... that's not going to go down well.One of two things has happened 1. Pretending they don’t hang out (weird cause there’s nothing to hide if it’s within the rules) 2. Separately use the same “photo shoot”spot...c’mon lasses you can do better, think outside the box.
Isn’t she/was (Faye) a buyer ? so will have a good eye for what works well - maybe an even better eye!Uh oh, I think faye is surpassing megan in the style ranks now... that's not going to go down well.
Yes!Isn’t she/was (Faye) a buyer ? so will have a good eye for what works well - maybe an even better eye!
I miss them too, I’ve said it before but I owe a big party my style transformation to Megan. I guess people change, but it’s all been sucked out. I think what frustrates me is that she (and this was long before baby) doesn’t want to put in the work as she did before but reap the financial gain, if you want to keep things private, fine - but don’t reveal the private elements of your life only when you want to flog something - that’s so disingenuous-her comments are always so complimentary though, surely people can see what’s happening non?Gahhh I really miss Megs YouTube.
The way she talked about clothes - she used all the lingo but it didn't feel inaccessible/snooty. I learned so much about clothes and styling.
Hauls (rightly so) died a bit but I loved her showing us an item of clothing and then talking interestingly about how she would style it and then showing an example in a cut away shot/video.
Her 5 ways to wear or whatever number n title they were called were also ace.
Shop my wardrobe type videos she did a couple of times where she would choose one item and style it in a few different ways...
Despite my little rant, i do completely agree with you! Just to clarify, my post was definitely not bashing Meg for her decision to not post all aspects of her experience. It was literally just a little rant about how it can be difficult to not see much of that onlineThis will be an unpopular opinion but I don’t think Megan has any obligation to post about the struggles of motherhood. She has a right to keep things personal and private. It’s great that people like Liv Purvis are choosing to do so, I don’t think that’s an expectation we should be putting on everyone as people should be able to deal with difficult things however they choose. I don’t think we should be harsh on people for choosing to keep struggles personal! Sharing is brave, not sharing is a personal choice.
While it wouldn’t be great to pretend to be living a perfect life and suggest there’s no negatives, I don’t think that’s what she is doing. It’s obvious to me she is just keeping some stuff private and only choosing to highlight positives to keep her space an upbeat one. I’m not reading that as ‘my life is perfect’ but rather ‘I’m choosing to share stuff that is positive’ and I think most other interpretations are a bit unfair
Of course - my post wasn’t directed you specifically at all - just generally something I’ve seen a lot on this thread (along with other things that mean I never post on this one )Despite my little rant, i do completely agree with you! Just to clarify, my post was definitely not bashing Meg for her decision to not post all aspects of her experience. It was literally just a little rant about how it can be difficult to not see much of that online