Awww love you too hun.this is exactly the reason I’ll defend Tattle to the fucking death, I love every single one of yer
Well he might. Guarantee it’ll look “forlorn” though.
Blame lockdown, it made us honeys take a fancy to some MP'sInformative synonym = Obsessive.
Why is Matt surreptitiously giving the photographer the finger???This is Matt’s Christmas card from last year featuring Hercules in a little Christmas jumper. He loves that dogView attachment 690063
Martha was probably the one taking the photoWhy is Matt surreptitiously giving the photographer the finger???
It should have been me Matt!!!! What has she got that I haven‘t?Together but apart….sorry @Gym&Tonic
Matt Hancock and Gina Coladangelo are not yet living as a couple
The former UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock is understood to be in regular contact with Gina Coladangelo - but they are not yet living together.www.dailymail.co.uk
Millions in the bank. Connections. Shared interests. You?It should have been me Matt!!!! What has she got that I haven‘t?
Just my body I’m afraidMillions in the bank. Connections. Shared interests. You?
She's got no morals hun. She's shown herself to be someone who will lie and cheat- not very good characteristics to be jealous of.It should have been me Matt!!!! What has she got that I haven‘t?
It would the the mistress equivalent of the wife standing meekly beside her Tory MP cheating husband a la David Mellor etc. No good would come of it. If they want a relationship they should just be discreet and consistent. Eventually the public forgives/loses interest. Look at Charles and Camilla. If they can crack on after all the upset they caused, not just to Diana and Wills/H but to the monarchy, then some rodent faced MP (sorry @Gym&Tonic ) and his ferrety mistress will have no problem. Their real problem is whether their relationship is sustainable and what they actually want. Take away the frisson of illicit fumbling and add in juggling kids and work, maintaining different households, maybe it was all for nowt.I think the idea of them appearing together in public for photographs to ‘defuse the situation’ and on the condition the press then leave them alone is a terrible one personally. Cringeworthy in fact. Don’t do that to your kids please Matt and Gina. The last thing they will want to see is you two looking all lovely dovey for the cameras plastered across the front pages again when everything will still be so raw for them. It’s also a really shitty thing to do Martha and Olly. Talk about rubbing their noses in it!
I totally take your point about the kids, but isn’t there a tiny bit of you that would like to see the two of them frolicking on a yacht à la Bennifer, or cavorting on a beach, with Matt rocking some sexy swimwear?I think the idea of them appearing together in public for photographs to ‘defuse the situation’ and on the condition the press then leave them alone is a terrible one personally. Cringeworthy in fact. Don’t do that to your kids please Matt and Gina. The last thing they will want to see is you two looking all lovely dovey for the cameras plastered across the front pages again when everything will still be so raw for them. It’s also a really shitty thing to do Martha and Olly. Talk about rubbing their noses in it!
I agree to a point, I can’t help but wonder who these ‘friends’ are talking to the press? I deffo think it was Martha that tipped off the paps that he’d be collecting his stuff though.I think the papers have no idea what’s going on with them , that’s why they are making up shit stories.
Id always be up for seeing Matt rocking some sexy swimwear. Maybe those tiny little speedos that the Olympic divers wearI totally take your point about the kids, but isn’t there a tiny bit of you that would like to see the two of them frolicking on a yacht à la Bennifer, or cavorting on a beach, with Matt rocking some sexy swimwear?
No? Just me then
Bearing in mind my own very eclectic taste in totty I’m really loathe to criticise anyone else, but honestly, if you are actually interested in seeing Matt Hancock in his budgie smugglers, have you at least considered a trip to Specsavers?I agree to a point, I can’t help but wonder who these ‘friends’ are talking to the press? I deffo think it was Martha that tipped off the paps that he’d be collecting his stuff though.
Id always be up for seeing Matt rocking some sexy swimwear. Maybe those tiny little speedos that the Olympic divers wear
You just know his speedos would be pink.I agree to a point, I can’t help but wonder who these ‘friends’ are talking to the press? I deffo think it was Martha that tipped off the paps that he’d be collecting his stuff though.
Id always be up for seeing Matt rocking some sexy swimwear. Maybe those tiny little speedos that the Olympic divers wear
Yeah go on Matt do it for @Gym&TonicI totally take your point about the kids, but isn’t there a tiny bit of you that would like to see the two of them frolicking on a yacht à la Bennifer, or cavorting on a beach, with Matt rocking some sexy swimwear?
No? Just me then
Maybe someone with better Photoshop skills than me can doctor his head onto that shot of Daniel Craig coming out of the water in Casino Royale?I agree to a point, I can’t help but wonder who these ‘friends’ are talking to the press? I deffo think it was Martha that tipped off the paps that he’d be collecting his stuff though.
Id always be up for seeing Matt rocking some sexy swimwear. Maybe those tiny little speedos that the Olympic divers wear
Are you sure that’s wise? It could be the thing that tips @Gym&Tonic over the edge - next thing we know she’ll be hiding outside Hancock’s house with a roll of gaffer tape and a large net.Maybe someone with better Photoshop skills than me can doctor his head onto that shot of Daniel Craig coming out of the water in Casino Royale?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?