seemingly there is no email, it was a British journalist who chose to mis represent what was discussed in the CB trial at court, wether this misrepresentation was an innocent error or done on purpose is up for debate, please see post 911.How bizarre. What’s it got to do with me?
I’m interested in the evidence. That’s it. In my opinion the evidence points to the McCanns. I couldn’t care less about this horrendous guy.
“Hanging around the area” is only circumstantial evidence. So is being “an actual proven rapist/utter rum of the earth type”. It’s not enough to charge and convict. That’s trial by Daily Mail and it sounds like that’s enough for you.
For me and many others though, that isn’t justice for Madeleine. If they have enough evidence to charge and convict CB, great. It just strikes me as more than a little bit odd that after 17 years, millions of ££ and police investigations in numerous different countries, and more recently 4 years’ worth of news about how CB is definitely the guy, the only shred of evidence found has amounted to an email.
it just seems like there is a need at all costs to by some to nail a patsy in this case and they are failing miserably!
---
the case was archived, not closed! the Mccann's have never been cleared! as for why there seems to have been a huge amount of Political media meddling why is the million dollar question!It is also "odd" that the police had enough to charge them at least with neglect, child abandonment and also hindering the investigation as they refused to take part in a reconstruction and give witness statements yet none of this happened. Why?
Last edited: