What about them? What do they prove?Again, I’m not talking about that.
I'm talking about their statements made about leaving the children alone.
What about them? What do they prove?Again, I’m not talking about that.
I'm talking about their statements made about leaving the children alone.
It proves that they weren’t remorseful and they felt they didn’t do anything wrongWhat about them? What do they prove?
I have a YouTube video for you.You'll have a long wait then sweet pea. I posted an extract from Kate's book which, to me as a reasonable person, showed clear regret and remorse. it will not be enough for you and I'm not going to search YouTube videos for more for you to say doesn't count for some spurious reason.
That they were initially very bullish in their defence of the decision to leave the children alone.What about them? What do they prove?
41 mins is some large bloke picking apart their interviews but the minutes before show really lovely home video footage of a happy, loving family.I have a YouTube video for you.
You can skip to around 41 mins and see their remorse or lack thereof. Let's just accept, no guilt or remorse was shown until she wanted to sell a book.
Gerry even goes on to acknowledge that Maddie cried and asked why they didn't come to her the night before. And then they thought it was fine to ditch her again the night she went missing.
This is what he had to say about the book:
Gerry McCann says: "It is a sad fact that not a single police force anywhere is proactively looking forMadeleine (as is the case for many other missing children). I am sure this book will re-energize the search for our daughter and the public will get behind the Find Madeleine campaign once again. It is simply unacceptable that the authorities could give up on Madeleine - especially without a single review of the case having been carried out. Our daughter, and whoever took her, are out there. We need your help to find them."
It's also unacceptable and a sad fact that their actions led to her being taken but he doesn't ever say this does he? Didn't they give up on her when they acknowledged that she felt unsafe yet left her anyway?
Ok. I don't see it as bullish. I see it as their justification for making the decision they made. She felt it was no different to eating dinner in your garden on a summer's evening. You disagree of course but, in the moment, that's what it felt like to her.That they were initially very bullish in their defence of the decision to leave the children alone.
Until, I would be surprised to find out, someone with slightly more PR savvy advised dialling that back a tad.
(never thought I’d be typing ’bullish’ so many times in one morning)
you think Gerry M was part of a paedophile ring though don't you? You think he dressed his daughter up in make up and, with his hands around her neck, posed her in a sexually provocative way so that she would appeal to other paedophiles and he could then send her out to be grape? (your comments page 36) If I was the Mccanns I don't think I'd be wanting sympathy from people like you.Kate is a GP, she would know about neglect, child protection, safe guarding. Part of her job is looking out for abuse and neglect.
Yet we're supposed to believe she thought it was completely acceptable to leave her three preschoolers in an unlocked apartment, in a foreign country, positioned between a public road and a swimming pool, then duck off to dinner out of sight and earshot - while telling the 3 year old to come find us.
I can't get my head around that. I just can't. I can't believe anyone is that stupid. So either they litrially didn't give a tit about their kids and their daughter paid the ultimate price for having tit parents. Or there was more to the whole thing than being let on.
I have no sympathy for the parents at all. They should have been charged for neglect and the other kids taken away to have a new life free from those two and every thing that has happened.
I wouldn't rule it out no. I don't know the McCann's. For all I know theyre in a Satanic sex cult. Let's face it stranger and more ducked up things happen in the world.41 mins is some large bloke picking apart their interviews but the minutes before show really lovely home video footage of a happy, loving family.
Ok. I don't see it as bullish. I see it as their justification for making the decision they made. She felt it was no different to eating dinner in your garden on a summer's evening. You disagree of course but, in the moment, that's what it felt like to her.
you think Gerry M was part of a paedophile ring though don't you? You think he dressed his daughter up in make up and, with his hands around her neck, posed her in a sexually provocative way so that she would appeal to other paedophiles and he could then send her out to be grape? (your comments page 36) If I was the Mccanns I don't think I'd be wanting sympathy from people like you.
They did leave a sick child. The child's father went to their apartment for "25 minutes" because the child had been sick. He then went back to the restaurant. All of the children were left alone at some point that night. Even the sick one.Nobody left a sick child. The parents of that child took it in turns to be with her.
If you bothered to watch it instead of being insulting about someone's appearance, you'd see it's actually the mccanns trying to justify their actions and Kate is being very bullish at 41.50 in my opinion. Anyway I see there's no point getting into any type of debate or sharing other opinions/insights with you.41 mins is some large bloke picking apart their interviews but the minutes before show really lovely home video footage of a happy, loving family.
Ok. I don't see it as bullish. I see it as their justification for making the decision they made. She felt it was no different to eating dinner in your garden on a summer's evening. You disagree of course but, in the moment, that's what it felt like to her.
you think Gerry M was part of a paedophile ring though don't you? You think he dressed his daughter up in make up and, with his hands around her neck, posed her in a sexually provocative way so that she would appeal to other paedophiles and he could then send her out to be grape? (your comments page 36) If I was the Mccanns I don't think I'd be wanting sympathy from people like you.
I've watched it. I don't see bullishness. Happy? I see parents answering a journalist's questionIf you bothered to watch it instead of being insulting about someone's appearance, you'd see it's actually the mccanns trying to justify their actions and Kate is being very bullish at 41.50 in my opinion. Anyway I see there's no point getting into any type of debate or sharing other opinions/insights with you.
When she says about the distance 41.4 on Google if you want to be really specific, she just comes across as arrogant and bullish, which is how I believe they've acted since the beginning. They truly believe that they did nothing wrong and it doesn't sit well with me.I've watched it. I don't see bullishness. Happy? I see parents answering a journalist's question
you're allowed to feel that. others are allowed to see another side.When she says about the distance 41.4 on Google if you want to be really specific, she just comes across as arrogant and bullish, which is how I believe they've acted since the beginning. They truly believe that they did nothing wrong and it doesn't sit well with me.
No evidence to suggest that and STILL no evidence from you that they are remorseful, apart from her book which I’ve read and can’t remember them ever being remorsefulyou think Gerry M was part of a paedophile ring though don't you? You think he dressed his daughter up in make up and, with his hands around her neck, posed her in a sexually provocative way so that she would appeal to other paedophiles and he could then send her out to be grape? (your comments page 36) If I was the Mccanns I don't think I'd be wanting sympathy from people like you.
That’s what I still can’t get my head around. An abduction would have been at bottom of a long list of things that could go wrong. Also the fact that she’d cried the previous night and they still felt ok to leave her blows my mind.They did leave a sick child. The child's father went to their apartment for "25 minutes" because the child had been sick. He then went back to the restaurant. All of the children were left alone at some point that night. Even the sick one.
You can make excuses for them all day long. But even "It's just like dining in your garden" doesn't wash. We used to dine in our garden in the summer, after our child was in bed. But we didn't leave our front door unlocked, and we closed any windows that weren't visible from our back garden. Not so much to protect him from abductors, but to stop him from getting out by himself. It's common sense. Something that was seemingly in very short supply amongst a group of so-called "professionals".
No they havent. They make excuses! Even Kate's mother said she was horrified that they were leaving their kids unattended!They have said that.
When did I say they weren't?you're allowed to feel that. others are allowed to see another side.