Madeleine McCann #3

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
New to this thread but I just want to say, I stayed in the same Resort as the McCanns the year before Maddie’s disappearance. What they did was not like eating in your garden. The Tapas bar was much further away from the apartment than a garden would be from a house.

I don‘t know what their state of mind was or is or whether they are truly remorseful for what they did. Only they will ever really know that. However I do know that if they’d been a working class family, staying in a downmarket resort they‘d have got a shed load more flak for what they did and possibly even faced charges for child neglect.

They have paid a huge price for their decision but nowhere near as big a price as that paid by their three year old daughter. I don’t hate them but I will admit I find it hard to be sympathetic towards them.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 35
I can’t stand the McCanns. Anyone who leaves their three little kids in an apartment alone while they duck off to dinner is a terribly irresponsible and neglectful parent. If they’d been lower class rather than doctors the level of sympathy towards them would have been far far lower.

I’ll probably get flamed for saying this but ultimately it’s all their fault. As a parent you protect and take care of your kids! Every time I see their simpering faces on tv I want to smack one of them. They may have paid the ultimate price but their little daughter paid the ultimate price because of their selfishness.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Haha
Reactions: 35
You'll have a long wait then sweet pea. I posted an extract from Kate's book which, to me as a reasonable person, showed clear regret and remorse. it will not be enough for you and I'm not going to search YouTube videos for more for you to say doesn't count for some spurious reason.
I have a YouTube video for you.



You can skip to around 41 mins and see their remorse or lack thereof. Let's just accept, no guilt or remorse was shown until she wanted to sell a book.

Gerry even goes on to acknowledge that Maddie cried and asked why they didn't come to her the night before. And then they thought it was fine to ditch her again the night she went missing.

This is what he had to say about the book:
Gerry McCann says: "It is a sad fact that not a single police force anywhere is proactively looking forMadeleine (as is the case for many other missing children). I am sure this book will re-energize the search for our daughter and the public will get behind the Find Madeleine campaign once again. It is simply unacceptable that the authorities could give up on Madeleine - especially without a single review of the case having been carried out. Our daughter, and whoever took her, are out there. We need your help to find them."

It's also unacceptable and a sad fact that their actions led to her being taken but he doesn't ever say this does he? Didn't they give up on her when they acknowledged that she felt unsafe yet left her anyway?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 14
Kate is a GP, she would know about neglect, child protection, safe guarding. Part of her job is looking out for abuse and neglect.

Yet we're supposed to believe she thought it was completely acceptable to leave her three preschoolers in an unlocked apartment, in a foreign country, positioned between a public road and a swimming pool, then duck off to dinner out of sight and earshot - while telling the 3 year old to come find us.

I can't get my head around that. I just can't. I can't believe anyone is that stupid. So either they litrially didn't give a tit about their kids and their daughter paid the ultimate price for having tit parents. Or there was more to the whole thing than being let on.

I have no sympathy for the parents at all. They should have been charged for neglect and the other kids taken away to have a new life free from those two and every thing that has happened.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 24
What about them? What do they prove?
That they were initially very bullish in their defence of the decision to leave the children alone.
Until, I would be surprised to find out, someone with slightly more PR savvy advised dialling that back a tad.

(never thought I’d be typing ’bullish’ so many times in one morning)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4
I have a YouTube video for you.



You can skip to around 41 mins and see their remorse or lack thereof. Let's just accept, no guilt or remorse was shown until she wanted to sell a book.

Gerry even goes on to acknowledge that Maddie cried and asked why they didn't come to her the night before. And then they thought it was fine to ditch her again the night she went missing.

This is what he had to say about the book:
Gerry McCann says: "It is a sad fact that not a single police force anywhere is proactively looking forMadeleine (as is the case for many other missing children). I am sure this book will re-energize the search for our daughter and the public will get behind the Find Madeleine campaign once again. It is simply unacceptable that the authorities could give up on Madeleine - especially without a single review of the case having been carried out. Our daughter, and whoever took her, are out there. We need your help to find them."

It's also unacceptable and a sad fact that their actions led to her being taken but he doesn't ever say this does he? Didn't they give up on her when they acknowledged that she felt unsafe yet left her anyway?
41 mins is some large bloke picking apart their interviews but the minutes before show really lovely home video footage of a happy, loving family.

That they were initially very bullish in their defence of the decision to leave the children alone.
Until, I would be surprised to find out, someone with slightly more PR savvy advised dialling that back a tad.

(never thought I’d be typing ’bullish’ so many times in one morning)
Ok. I don't see it as bullish. I see it as their justification for making the decision they made. She felt it was no different to eating dinner in your garden on a summer's evening. You disagree of course but, in the moment, that's what it felt like to her.

Kate is a GP, she would know about neglect, child protection, safe guarding. Part of her job is looking out for abuse and neglect.

Yet we're supposed to believe she thought it was completely acceptable to leave her three preschoolers in an unlocked apartment, in a foreign country, positioned between a public road and a swimming pool, then duck off to dinner out of sight and earshot - while telling the 3 year old to come find us.

I can't get my head around that. I just can't. I can't believe anyone is that stupid. So either they litrially didn't give a tit about their kids and their daughter paid the ultimate price for having tit parents. Or there was more to the whole thing than being let on.

I have no sympathy for the parents at all. They should have been charged for neglect and the other kids taken away to have a new life free from those two and every thing that has happened.
you think Gerry M was part of a paedophile ring though don't you? You think he dressed his daughter up in make up and, with his hands around her neck, posed her in a sexually provocative way so that she would appeal to other paedophiles and he could then send her out to be grape? (your comments page 36) If I was the Mccanns I don't think I'd be wanting sympathy from people like you.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 5
41 mins is some large bloke picking apart their interviews but the minutes before show really lovely home video footage of a happy, loving family.



Ok. I don't see it as bullish. I see it as their justification for making the decision they made. She felt it was no different to eating dinner in your garden on a summer's evening. You disagree of course but, in the moment, that's what it felt like to her.



you think Gerry M was part of a paedophile ring though don't you? You think he dressed his daughter up in make up and, with his hands around her neck, posed her in a sexually provocative way so that she would appeal to other paedophiles and he could then send her out to be grape? (your comments page 36) If I was the Mccanns I don't think I'd be wanting sympathy from people like you.
I wouldn't rule it out no. I don't know the McCann's. For all I know theyre in a Satanic sex cult. Let's face it stranger and more ducked up things happen in the world.

I never said any of that about the photo. You've really read between the lines there. I said an adult had done her make up. I said it was werid to take a photo of your child crying and upset and I said it looks like someone is gripping the back of her neck.

And by people like me, do you mean people that protect their children, look after them and value them? Id rather be a person like me than a selfish twatt that leaves their little kids alone to be subjected to god knows what.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
you think Gerry M was part of a paedophile ring though don't you? You think he dressed his daughter up in make up and, with his hands around her neck, posed her in a sexually provocative way so that she would appeal to other paedophiles and he could then send her out to be grape? (your comments page 36) If I was the Mccanns I don't think I'd be wanting sympathy from people like you.
[/QUOTE]

No evidence to suggest that and STILL no evidence from you that they are remorseful, apart from her book which I’ve read and can’t remember them ever being remorseful
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Nobody left a sick child. The parents of that child took it in turns to be with her.
They did leave a sick child. The child's father went to their apartment for "25 minutes" because the child had been sick. He then went back to the restaurant. All of the children were left alone at some point that night. Even the sick one.

You can make excuses for them all day long. But even "It's just like dining in your garden" doesn't wash. We used to dine in our garden in the summer, after our child was in bed. But we didn't leave our front door unlocked, and we closed any windows that weren't visible from our back garden. Not so much to protect him from abductors, but to stop him from getting out by himself. It's common sense. Something that was seemingly in very short supply amongst a group of so-called "professionals".
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 22
41 mins is some large bloke picking apart their interviews but the minutes before show really lovely home video footage of a happy, loving family.



Ok. I don't see it as bullish. I see it as their justification for making the decision they made. She felt it was no different to eating dinner in your garden on a summer's evening. You disagree of course but, in the moment, that's what it felt like to her.



you think Gerry M was part of a paedophile ring though don't you? You think he dressed his daughter up in make up and, with his hands around her neck, posed her in a sexually provocative way so that she would appeal to other paedophiles and he could then send her out to be grape? (your comments page 36) If I was the Mccanns I don't think I'd be wanting sympathy from people like you.
If you bothered to watch it instead of being insulting about someone's appearance, you'd see it's actually the mccanns trying to justify their actions and Kate is being very bullish at 41.50 in my opinion. Anyway I see there's no point getting into any type of debate or sharing other opinions/insights with you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13
If you bothered to watch it instead of being insulting about someone's appearance, you'd see it's actually the mccanns trying to justify their actions and Kate is being very bullish at 41.50 in my opinion. Anyway I see there's no point getting into any type of debate or sharing other opinions/insights with you.
I've watched it. I don't see bullishness. Happy? I see parents answering a journalist's question
 
I've watched it. I don't see bullishness. Happy? I see parents answering a journalist's question
When she says about the distance 41.4 on Google if you want to be really specific, she just comes across as arrogant and bullish, which is how I believe they've acted since the beginning. They truly believe that they did nothing wrong and it doesn't sit well with me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
When she says about the distance 41.4 on Google if you want to be really specific, she just comes across as arrogant and bullish, which is how I believe they've acted since the beginning. They truly believe that they did nothing wrong and it doesn't sit well with me.
you're allowed to feel that. others are allowed to see another side.

you think Gerry M was part of a paedophile ring though don't you? You think he dressed his daughter up in make up and, with his hands around her neck, posed her in a sexually provocative way so that she would appeal to other paedophiles and he could then send her out to be grape? (your comments page 36) If I was the Mccanns I don't think I'd be wanting sympathy from people like you.
No evidence to suggest that and STILL no evidence from you that they are remorseful, apart from her book which I’ve read and can’t remember them ever being remorseful
[/QUOTE]

No evidence to suggest what? The abuse ring? Yes I know that. Stop going on about the remorse thing. I believe they are remorseful, I believe they have shown this and you do not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
They did leave a sick child. The child's father went to their apartment for "25 minutes" because the child had been sick. He then went back to the restaurant. All of the children were left alone at some point that night. Even the sick one.

You can make excuses for them all day long. But even "It's just like dining in your garden" doesn't wash. We used to dine in our garden in the summer, after our child was in bed. But we didn't leave our front door unlocked, and we closed any windows that weren't visible from our back garden. Not so much to protect him from abductors, but to stop him from getting out by himself. It's common sense. Something that was seemingly in very short supply amongst a group of so-called "professionals".
That’s what I still can’t get my head around. An abduction would have been at bottom of a long list of things that could go wrong. Also the fact that she’d cried the previous night and they still felt ok to leave her blows my mind.
I hate conspiracy theories but, when they’ve happily admitted and tried to normalise such insanely poor (IMO) parenting from the start, it makes it easier to believe them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
There was a wee girl murdered on the Isle Bute - a small island in Scotland

Her grandparents had left their front door unlocked - because they felt they lived in a safe comminity. They were asleep in the house when she was taken.

I got into argument on Twitter when someone suggested that this was the same as the McCanns!!! I thought there's a world of difference between being asleep in your bed and having a booze up in a restrurant!!! I also felt that the wee girls grandparents might not be happy to be associated with the McCanns.

And, yes there were undertones in the trial that they were somehow at fault because they hadn't locked their door.

So I've never understood how the McCanns got a free pass on quite obvious neglect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 17
Here's some fine examples of really remorseful parents.
There isn't one of grieving Gerry playing tennis a few days after she went missing (which Mark Warner staff confirmed happened) , but I'm sure he looked as upset as he does here.

The ones of them doing their sad faces are only found when doing press shoots, and not when they're papped, but I'm sure there's no coincidence there
 

Attachments

  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 12
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.