She had it shaved off a couple of months before the wedding.
She's descendant from royalty.
Also, what did she do to that mole she had on her face?
Dior has lost its lux appeal. Nothing luxurious or special about items sent for free to a bunch of uneducated unqualified film in a room airheads. Designer brands used to be a status symbol, representing luxury and the elite. Now they’re no better that street brands the second they ‘partner’ with anyone on social media.Ha! Lydia Millen #PartneringwithDior = Free Foundation In Exchange for Content
No. Lydia is not partnering with the house of Dior. It's the unique brand hashtag required for the campaign (i.e., tracking purposes). And literally anyone with a beauty account and a face seems to have received a free foundation in return for an IG mention.
Reality: Gifted in exchange for content
If Lydia were a "proper context" influenza it would read something like this: Gifted in exchange for content.
View attachment 46127
View attachment 46128
Reality: Dior Makeup seems to be working with anyone "with a face" [emoji2368]
View attachment 46131
Lydia tries her best to be a special little snowflake. [emoji2368]
This. So true.Dior has lost its lux appeal. Nothing luxurious or special about items sent for free to a bunch of uneducated unqualified film in a room airheads. Designer brands used to be a status symbol, representing luxury and the elite. Now they’re no better that street brands the second they ‘partner’ with anyone on social media.
She could be hinting at being a time traveller...or perhaps it’s just another one of her brain farts.In her new video at the beginning where she is wearing the polka dot top...she says it wore this last night and it arrived today’. Am I confused or does this not make sense?!
Even if I didn't dislike Lydia this much, I really don't think she has the 'DIOR' look.View attachment 46092View attachment 46093
Lydia you’re in the same position as Vicki.
You’re the makeup/fragrance counter girl.
You’re not partnering with Dior you’re working for Dior beauty.
You will never work with the fashion housekeep flogging that foundation.
They give out freebies so it’s noy exactly the Lux look you’re going for
I agree! When I saw the bag, I couldn't help but think of the cheap bags you see in those cheap holiday markets.I know off post but I really hate Jimmy Choo’s new branding.
Even on their plain heels they now have “Jc” on the back.
Cheapens the style in my opinion. Not everyone wants to be plastered in designer logos.
Even if I didn't dislike Lydia this much, I really don't think she has the 'DIOR' look.
She looks hard and I just feel like I can't put into words... She looks like she should be partnering with Boohoo- some cheap brands if that makes sense?
She doesn't have the regal and classy look. I think this is why Dior doesn't want to use her as much as they do others.
When I think of Dior, I think of angelic, soft and naturally beautiful faces
Lydia isn't for Dior.
I agree! When I saw the bag, I couldn't help but think of the cheap bags you see in those cheap holiday markets.
I don't know who is in charge of the rebranding but it's definitely the wrong move.
I agree with you. There are plenty of YT videos, in which the creator refers to a/several comments usually by inserting a screenshot of the comment(s) (or in some vids, edits the screenshots to pile up on the screen)... the extra 30seconds of cutting and pasting adds credibility to the creator and it shows that they are engaging with their audience, or creating content for them.That's the thing, all these influenzers say 'Oh I've had so many msgs about this and that', it can never be proven as they never show the actual messages, sooooo i personally believe its a load of bullsh**, just lying too make the item they have seem popular.
Is she only ordering from Zara home? As she needs this t-shirt.You've done it now- Cruella de filler & her 101 ads
Spot onI agree with you. There are plenty of YT videos, in which the creator refers to a/several comments usually by inserting a screenshot of the comment(s) (or in some vids, edits the screenshots to pile up on the screen)... the extra 30seconds of cutting and pasting adds credibility to the creator and it shows that they are engaging with their audience, or creating content for them.
But it comes across as being deceitful when influbeggars use a blanket statement “i’ve had so many compliments because i’ve been smearing this shit by ChaNo on my face, in the shade ‘desperate’... swipe up/link is in the comments.” (like chanel but no). Trying to justify yet another #prsample #prgift #itsnotanadipromise and hoping their audience doesn’t wake up and walk of shame away from them.
[emoji19]
.
Do you ladies think that maybe these luxury brands are actually struggling at the moment? I just can't help but think about the UK economy at the moment and overall spending habits. Even fast fashion brands like Forever 21 has failed and maybe these luxury brands feel like they have no choice but have these low level influencers to promote their products. I think maybe Dior is struggling too and all these other brands like Jimmy Choo are rebranding. I feel like these luxe brands have no other choice.Dior has lost its lux appeal. Nothing luxurious or special about items sent for free to a bunch of uneducated unqualified film in a room airheads. Designer brands used to be a status symbol, representing luxury and the elite. Now they’re no better that street brands the second they ‘partner’ with anyone on social media.
Every one of those outfits were bloomin AWFULThe "vegan" leather... aka fake leather that she probs over paid for synthetic material.. & those boots are truly just an awful look together. For a chick that spends so much of her time trying to look tall and skinny, she certainly found an outfit to make her look box-y and heavy on the bottom half. YUCK
& the ad gifted item and sponsored video was exceptionally crappy yet again
Fair point, you need to weigh up the positives and negatives.Do you ladies think that maybe these luxury brands are actually struggling at the moment? I just can't help but think about the UK economy at the moment and overall spending habits. Even fast fashion brands like Forever 21 has failed and maybe these luxury brands feel like they have no choice but have these low level influencers to promote their products. I think maybe Dior is struggling too and all these other brands like Jimmy Choo are rebranding. I feel like these luxe brands have no other choice.
Just think what Daniella Westbrook did for Burberry.Fair point, you need to weigh up the positives and negatives.
Is it worth getting involved in this and devaluing your brand or do you ride the storm and protect your name and reputation.
I know Apple have always said they will never give products for free or on discount because it instantly gives consumers the impression they are in competition with other companies when they don’t view anyone as competition [emoji51]
We know they do give small discounts now but apparently freebies are still a no.
I think I’d protect my name and stay away from influencer advertising if I owned a company.
When I hear Gucci now I think Chav. [emoji2368]
I'm not surprised, China is a major key player in most industries. They are pumping money right left.I think China is helping keep Dior afloat https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-l...hina-demand-boosts-luxury-group-idUKKCN1RN0LD
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?