I agree, I’ve just got caught up with the full series so far and I thought this one was really interesting.
Crime Scene 2 Courtroom is doing the Lords workI love his voiceovers too.
He does such a good job and paints a great picture of LL. it’s so interesting.
He does…… the way he voices Nick Johnson KC as this cunning, clever prosecutor and then he voices Lucy as dull, vague and unsure makes his content. It definitely leaves an impression.
It was after all the other attacks had occurred. Think about a week after the two triplets died and babyQ. She shouldn't have been there. It would make your blood run cold.That would make you feel really strange knowing that. Thank god she was transferred out, who knows what could have happened.
It's insane that she was still working on the ward at that pointIt was after all the other attacks had occurred. Think about a week after the two triplets died and babyQ. She shouldn't have been there. It would make your blood run cold.
It’s beyond belief.It's insane that she was still working on the ward at that point
I agree. Taken individually there is doubt in each case as it could have been done by someone else or been an accident. It's when there all looked at together, along with a pattern of attacking multiples that it becomes obvious it was her targeting them. She seems to lose control at the end with Baby O, P and Q attacked in consecutive days.The thing that still strikes me is this.
She was going to get caught at some point, it was inevitable. More inevitable than almost all serial killers because her crimes were always in the same place and the same victims in high frequency. She surely must have known she would almost definitely be caught.
She would have known perhaps if she stopped at Baby D, Baby E or even Baby F then perhaps it would have been seen as just a horrible run of bad luck. Perhaps if she had really spaced them out, maybe one every 18 months or so probably no one would have noticed and she could have probably carried on for the rest of her life. She wasn't stupid. She was clearly manipulative and was always laying the groundwork for the next kill.
With all that in mind I find it hard to get my head around how the sheer fear of being caught could be overridden by whatever it was that drove her. Overrode her choice to stop, overrode her choice to really space them out to avoid suspicion. She couldn't help herself. That's how dangerous she was.
Although I agree, I would argue that she maybe thought she wouldn't ever be caught, considering the hospital bosses made consultants write her a letter of apology and it's almost like they made special arrangements for her. Perhaps she was cocky because of the protection she'd had by the time she got to Babies O, P and Q.The thing that still strikes me is this.
She was going to get caught at some point, it was inevitable. More inevitable than almost all serial killers because her crimes were always in the same place and the same victims in high frequency. She surely must have known she would almost definitely be caught.
She would have known perhaps if she stopped at Baby D, Baby E or even Baby F then perhaps it would have been seen as just a horrible run of bad luck. Perhaps if she had really spaced them out, maybe one every 18 months or so probably no one would have noticed and she could have probably carried on for the rest of her life. She wasn't stupid. She was clearly manipulative and was always laying the groundwork for the next kill.
With all that in mind I find it hard to get my head around how the sheer fear of being caught could be overridden by whatever it was that drove her. Overrode her choice to stop, overrode her choice to really space them out to avoid suspicion. She couldn't help herself. That's how dangerous she was.
Might gohttps://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/fury-pro-lucy-letby-supporters-32580193.amp
they really have no sense do they?
Oooh is it tomorrow? I thought it was 25th?Tomorrow will be an interesting day, hopefully the application for permission to appeal is rejected
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?