They’re bloody idiots
They’re bloody idiotsThe police won't have told them anything at all. And yet they hope the gullible saps believe this utter shite.
mark is just a Letby fanboy who has popped up recently for the free Lucy campaign. He posts in one of the Facebook groups but also on Twitter and youtube. But seems like this is only since the verdicts.I’ve still not read everything, who is mark? Have the crazy James’ not had anything to say since the verdicts?
He’s debunking the white one now & says he’s got a non redacted copy that shows that someone else harmed the babies. The deluded twatI hope they continue going down the rabbit hole of the notes and they waste even more of their time in such pointless facts.
We should provide them with even more creative alternative options for transliterating the notes I think. That will help them.
No sense at allDoesn't really make sense "How can things ever be how they accused, they won't, I killed them on purpose" surely she would just write "Falsely accused of killing babies".
“Contains information that will only be given to the appeal once the appeal is underway”?He’s debunking the white one now & says he’s got a non redacted copy that shows that someone else harmed the babies. The deluded twat
---
No sense at all
https://giphy.com/1lAOemoi0KhPMzxczTHe’s debunking the white one now & says he’s got a non redacted copy that shows that someone else harmed the babies. The deluded twat
---
No sense at all
Isn’t the note just redacted for press release - and they would have seen the unredacted version in court?He’s debunking the white one now & says he’s got a non redacted copy that shows that someone else harmed the babies. The deluded twat
---
No sense at all
Yes I think they would have seen the original in court. Haha definitelyIsn’t the note just redacted for press release - and they would have seen the unredacted version in court?
Getting inspector Gadget vibes more than Sherlock Holmes, not gonna lie
ummmm, so she’s not real? What is she then? A robot? An alien?
'Kin hell, people have had counter terrorism police crashing through their doors for posting that sort of racist bile.Why is it that literally all of the Letby defenders are either
1) Thick as mince
2) Conspiracy theorists
3) White supremacists
4) All of the above
?
Below are some of the other tweets from “the joker”, I’ve put them behind a spoiler because they’re genuinely some of the most vile things I’ve ever read
Seriously, this is the man who everyone is currently praising for “debunking” the confession note. Fucking head case needs to be on some sort of register.
And like Marky lad in that video, thirsty in more ways than one'Kin hell, people have had counter terrorism police crashing through their doors for posting that sort of racist bile.
The only other category of Lucifer simp I can think of is the middle aged, thirsty bloke
I don't think the link works but it's in the daily mail.EXCLUSIVE How Lucy Letby's legal aid cost nearly £1million: Serial killer benefitted from £980,000 … # via https://android.com
Didn't our favourite statistician claim she couldn't afford a defence?
I can't read the link but I assume that was paid by the government since everyone has the right to be defended.EXCLUSIVE How Lucy Letby's legal aid cost nearly £1million: Serial killer benefitted from £980,000 … # via https://android.com
Didn't our favourite statistician claim she couldn't afford a defence?
How so, given that she's guilty and also agreed to the facts that BM was initially disputing, e.g. the insulin?I can't read the link but I assume that was paid by the government since everyone has the right to be defended.
Frankly I would ask for my tax money back that went into her defence. A blind snail would have done a better job frankly. I am all for her being guilty but I believe her case could've been defended a little better.
I’m interested in how she could have had a better defence tooHow so, given that she's guilty and also agreed to the facts that BM was initially disputing, e.g. the insulin?
As the old adage goes, you can’t polish a turd. Like others have said, I think BM did the best he could with what he had - I am happy her defence cost so much tbh, shows she had a fair a trial as she could have with the best possible representation, another up yours for the conspiracy theorists who said it was sub-par.I can't read the link but I assume that was paid by the government since everyone has the right to be defended.
Frankly I would ask for my tax money back that went into her defence. A blind snail would have done a better job frankly. I am all for her being guilty but I believe her case could've been defended a little better.
Her defence needed an expert witness to cast doubt on the medical evidence, I don't believe they didn't consult a neonalist just that all medical opinions came back that the baby's were attacked while Lucy was there. Therefore BM could only use a plumber as he was the only witness who wasn't going to end up backing up the prosecution.I can't read the link but I assume that was paid by the government since everyone has the right to be defended.
Frankly I would ask for my tax money back that went into her defence. A blind snail would have done a better job frankly. I am all for her being guilty but I believe her case could've been defended a little better.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?