Oh ok thanks. I’ve not seen anything mentioned about them before in this case. Do they do reports about their findings seeing this case is in the public interest?
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
They write reports, but they only share them with the trust, the healthcare professionals involved and the family. However I’ve never known such a high profile case so I suspect they’d be quoted. I’m definitely no expert in law processes lol
I think the difficulty at this point is lack of context. We've seen snippets of information, but not enough to get a clear picture. It's like putting a jigsaw together when half the pieces are missing. I'm interested to know whether the evidence that's still to come will clarify things or muddy the waters even more.
This is what I’m finding. There’s a lot that could be misconstrued from what we’ve seen so far, and while my gut feeling is that she’s guilty, there’s not much to go on yet that couldn’t be explained away by a good defence team. I’ll be interested to see what else they produce. I don’t doubt that the prosecution will have stacked their evidence up over the last two years.
I think while obviously we need to see the trial and amount of evidence through, I just can't ultimately convince myself she could be anything other than guilty with the sheer number of 'coincidences' there would have to be.
I get her notes completely unless you have been arrested for a horrific crime especially if you haven't done it the absolute shock this sends you into, police also speak to you like they don't believe a word out of your mouth.
If she’s not guilty which I highly doubt she’s not how the hell are they going to explain all these poor babies dying 
The NHS is a huge organisation and must be bureaucratic.
Some might have had their suspicions but how many would jump to ‘someone’s killing babies’. It’s obviously not right but would the bureaucracy delay swift action? After all, it’s basically committees and everyone knows how tangled they can be.
I mean you have the Shrewsbury maternity scandal where hundreds of babies died over 20 years and the hospital blamed the mothers for itIf she’s not guilty which I highly doubt she’s not how the hell are they going to explain all these poor babies dying
Yes exactly and basically independent reviews took place and have already deemed all of this not the fault of collective failures. So if somebody is responsible- it has to be her. If it was one or two occasions maybe something else happened and another time there’s this reason and xyz but it isn’t- it’s many many occasions and the same type of things happening, same presentations, even to the point of the two babies in sets of multiples- one each dying a separate way, two in each set poisoned the same way. They were poorly babies but were not by any means predicted to die. As we’ve heard, lots of posters on this thread have happy stories of babies going home after needing this kind of care. It really breaks my heart these babies fought so hard against the odds to survive and should have been ok. It must be torturous for the parents to think they should have made it after allIf she’s not guilty which I highly doubt she’s not how the hell are they going to explain all these poor babies dying
How does one get a job as a court artist because some of the drawings look like they have it in for Lucy
How was it missed by the police tho only found by familyHe does. If only he’d got rid of that silencer
I agree that there a few people on here who love to jump down anybody who disagrees with them’s throats and I think it’s only healthy to look at both sides of the coin, but some people have taken it way too far with the conspiracy theories, it’s ridiculous. I’ve also seen people on both sides of the argument either accidentally misunderstand the evidence OR purposefully twisting the words of the defence/prosecution and then other people pick up on it and the evidence becomes something it isn’t. I just think people need to be careful about going too wild with the conspiracy theories and trying to fit the evidence into it where it doesn’t.
Not an attack on you littlemy, I agree it’s healthy to look at both sides of the argument but I have seen a few posts that are just wild conspiracy theories and this isn’t some tv drama a la Line of Duty, it’s real life, innocent little babies have died and at the end of the day it’s somebodies fault, it’s important we get down to the truth whether she’s guilty or not.
i read a great article (which i’ll try and find) about court artists after those infamous drawings of the kardashians recently - apparently there are very strict rules on how you draw people, including not making them too “attractive” or stylised. you have to draw people deliberately plain. which might explain itHow does one get a job as a court artist because some of the drawings look like they have it in for Lucy
I swear to god if I ever end up in a criminal court it wouldn’t be prison I’d be scared of, it’d be those bloody drawings. They’re always dreadfulHow does one get a job as a court artist because some of the drawings look like they have it in for Lucy
I swear to god if I ever end up in a criminal court it wouldn’t be prison I’d be scared of, it’d be those bloody drawings. They’re always dreadful
Reminds me of this episode of This Country
I thought JB had put it back himself for some reason. Saying that, I’m not sure.
He still has his supporters even now although I don’t think there’s many.
Lmao the top one inexplicably resembles Liz Truss. I think that's just the chunky forehead though.
Even worse than a passport photo.I swear to god if I ever end up in a criminal court it wouldn’t be prison I’d be scared of, it’d be those bloody drawings. They’re always dreadful
- Status