Yeah, I don't believe that if she is guilty, her first attack/murder was within an hour of her shift starting. I don't suppose we'll ever find out about any of those possible early things and how many babies may have been assaulted.
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I meant to ask this yesterday...for someone who doesn't work in health, what is a split shift?
Lucy Letby Case #7
Continuing from thread 6. Today is day 2, week 2 of what's expected to be a 6 month trial. Yesterday we heard the agreed facts surrounding Baby A&B and also statements from Baby A&Bs Parents & Grandmother. Claire Hocknell the intelligence analyst employed by Cheshire Police also provided insight...
tattle.life
At this moment nobody on this forum is right, as she not been proven guilty or not guilty yet.
So hopefully we can debate on each other’s points without causing upset or forum to be closed.
Moving on today, I see it’s going to be Dr discussing baby A and B, does anyone know will the poor parents and grandparent from yesterday have to be questioned on stand by defence or prosecution or is that them done ? I was thinking about them last night
So hopefully we can debate on each other’s points without causing upset or forum to be closed.
Moving on today, I see it’s going to be Dr discussing baby A and B, does anyone know will the poor parents and grandparent from yesterday have to be questioned on stand by defence or prosecution or is that them done ? I was thinking about them last night
If that’s the case than I hope those people posing theories and questions are just looking for responses based on what’s been said so far which is all I see happening?x
I believe that’s the case too, which is why I think it’s unfair for them to then get this ‘scapegoat theory’ pusher label
Yeah I accept that but it’s a discussion about a very emotive case with strangers on the internet. I’m not sure what people (not aimed at you, meaning ‘people’ in general) expect
No, I agree. That was my point exactly. I don't think this is a conspiracy to scapegoat her. It can be possible that the police think it's her, other medical experts believe it could be her and still it may not be. The witnesses are just answering questions about specific pieces of evidence...they aren't conspiring. The evidence may prove that it was LL, but it also may not and, especially in a case like this, a lot of the evidence isn't clear cut. That's why we have trials. So that all of the evidence can be presented to an independent jury and can be looked at all together. No one is infallible, not the police, not doctors, no one. The police do get things wrong...
I've got no idea if Lucy Letby is innocent or guilty! owing to personal experience on another matter I would not rule out collusion from organisations, sadly my eyes have been opened up!
Maybe we can now call it a cover up theory then, because that seems to be the new terminology that seems a little softer - as someone already noticed ‘scapegoat lite’ which tickled meI believe that’s the case too, which is why I think it’s unfair for them to then get this ‘scapegoat theory’ pusher label
unfortunately I just don’t see a way round it other than people trying not to get personally butt hurt 
When I’m going whaaat really?! I’m not suggesting the poster is a twit. I married a Tory 
so I’m capable of looking past anything haha xIt's a bit early at post #943, but I'll lock as it's people arguing and policing. New threads are made at post 1000 / page 50
- Status