*Hillsborough has entered the chat*
The NHS have made plenty mistakes and also took the blame for it, I am positive they are not taking this secrete to the grave to cover something that didn’t need covered up in the first place
Well not by only that aspect of evidence alone, no! By all of it combined so far, yes I do. I’m not the judge or jury- I don’t have to wait for anything before I make my own interpretations or opinions on it. But I will listen to anything that says otherwise and weigh it against what I’ve heard so far of course! And my opinion, like yours, still won’t matter at all.
Someone suggested it could have been written whilst she was on the phone, so taking notes. I think there could be a possibility she was writing what was being said by others. Without the context of when the note was written it's difficult to analyse fully. I wonder if the circumstances of when it was written will be addressed in court or of it will only focus on the content of the notes.
Yes, but you must also be aware then that it also can be one or the other? It just seems a lot of posters have had this case drawn up and solved before we've even got into it. I'm sure there will be many more twists and turns.@avabella you are aware the hospital can be negligent AND Lucy be a murderer at the same time? It doesn’t just have to be one or the other. In fact you could argue Lucy knew the hospital being negligent/under staffed meant she could actually carry out what she is accused of much easier effectively using this to her advantage. The trust is not on trial here Lucy is. Regardless of what the hospital did or didn’t do if she has murdered them then she has murdered them
If she’s not taking the stand in her defence, is it likely this note will ever be explained?
I have gave reasons to why she could be innocent plenty of times. You seem to not be happy at anyone who suggests she is guilty but want to make sure you protest her innocence which makes you no difference to anyone declaring her guilty after 5 days..
Haha the answer is nope
Why the big assumptions? I really couldn't care either way what anyone else thinks, the same as they shouldn't really bother what I think either - it's all open for discussion. I find all the different theories really interesting and it's enlightening hearing about medical terminology and procedures. Sometimes questions might sound stupid but if you don't work in that industry than you can't know until you ask. I'm not protesting anyone's innocence but trying to look objectively and see if other explanations are plausible.
Much agreement with this. Clearly a lot of people do believe the narrative of a failing hospital scape goating her too🫣
Totally agree , I feel IF she is , the hospital standards and competence allowed her to get away for that long
Please outline the benefits for the trust for allowing a serial killing nurse to flourish over accepting their own failures? Many many trusts are failing, many have to answer negligence cases against them. I wonder why more don’t go down the blaming a serial killer route? The trust are getting there arses handed to them over this. You’ve not answered whether you think the nhs conspired to poison babies via insulin to cover their tracks? Can I suggest if you think yes to that- you probably do lean on the wild conspiracy theory side of things ever so slightly
I just can’t fathom how a hospital would rather be seen to have a child killer in their staff instead of just accepting they were failing and make changes to fix it!
I agree. Both parties guilty, although one intentionally and the other due to negligence.
