Whereas the irony is she could have had the whole month sorted with just the bloody handover notes. And maybe the commode.Letby’s version
Day 1 - the shredder. Oh tit
Whereas the irony is she could have had the whole month sorted with just the bloody handover notes. And maybe the commode.Letby’s version
Day 1 - the shredder. Oh tit
This is probably how some (most) of the jury feel as wellI actually can’t cope
10 months and back to this. Night all
![]()
Jesus wept. That utter bleep.I think the general consensus is she was keeping the handover Sheets as souvenirs or trophies of her handiwork.
Also during cross examination, she was asked to spell the surname of one of the babies, which was apparently a more difficult name to spell. She spelled it incorrectly. However,she did a Facebook search of this child’s family long after their death. It was alluded to in prosecution that she was using the handover sheet as a reminder of the spelling so she could look up the family for some grief porn.
BIB.Alll of that evidence and those measly points are reasonable doubt??! Seriously. How about the poisoning? There is an accepted poisoner on the ward.
You attacked people for seeing the note as evidence of a confession, yet you’re literally forming your reasonable doubt of her guilt because there are other babies that died on the unit? Their deaths will be explainable! They’re not part of the case, what on Earth do they show about her innocence? They didn’t take baby G too early? She was born very prem but had overcome all the worst hurdles by the time she got to CoCH. Baby K was there too early but HAD to be born there in an emergency and was being transferred out. There’s no evidence at all that the needle left in punctured anything.
There is a very big difference between a desaturation, a collapse and a cardiac arrest. The latter being pretty rare, especially when totally out the blue. Which babies had cardiac arrests when Letby wasn’t around?
Thoughts on the insulin cases? Why are they framing someone to cover up for failings when someone undoubtedly attacked child F and L, why are they protecting said person?Be my guest
I’ve been on the LL threads on and off the entire trial and have swung between not being able to decide and guilty throughout.
For me the case is not proven beyond reasonable doubt. There are 5 other babies deaths she isn’t charged with so what happened to them? We're led to believe these babies were not expected to die, then we're told the unit was taking babies of earlier gestation (was it child G?) than they usually did. The nurses were also caring for more than one baby at a time too which is not best practice.
The babies LL is charged with murdering or trying to also collapsed on other shifts or on days she didn’t work, so naturally she can’t be charged with those attempts, but they happened, along with 5 other deaths, why?
Baby E is the worrying case, and the two triplet brothers 'probably coming back with a bang' from her holiday. With baby E I remember evidence that babies don’t bleed like that, then much later on in the trial that early gestation babies can be prone to haemorrhage?? So I can see why the jury is taking their time to go over everything and learn about what can go wrong, and whether that’s what happened, or they were deliberately hurt.
Baby H had a butterfly needle left in her chest that nobody knew if it had punctured her lung tissue causing the problems she was suffering.
This is one case where I’d like to know more about her background and what she was like as a person before deciding, which of course isn’t allowed. BUT she was either a criminal mastermind hurting and murdering babies without being detected for so long (and I don’t think she’s that clever) or she’s a scapegoat for a badly failing unit, or?
I shared a story early on but I have relatives working in the NHS and I know how the NHS can lie, covers up and protects its own. look how many Trusts and sectors within the NHS are in special measures for failures and bullying.
So before I’d lock her up forever, I’d be taking my time, like the jury is, to come to the right conclusion.
You can stay.Jesus wept. That utter bleep.
Not usually one to get involved but I still don’t see any of your reasoning for NGI’m on the FB groups but I don’t comment. I also don’t belittle those who think differently to me because in reality what does it change? Nothing!
Go on Slingoooohikn
Thoughts on the insulin cases? Why are they framing someone to cover up for failings when someone undoubtedly attacked child F and L, why are they protecting said person?
It had nothing to do with the collapses that she’s charged with.
I bloody love this!! I do anything to avoid cooking where possibleI got so sick of this rit every day that I found an app that does a family calendar. I put the meals in every week and now if if anyone asks I can shout ‘check the bloody calendar!’
sometimes I put tit and sugar just for the lolsI bloody love this!! I do anything to avoid cooking where possible![]()
Can you imagine how long the trial would have been if they had charged her with all of thoseAlso @GrunkaLunka unfortunately we don’t know how many other babies are suspected of being victims but just haven’t been included in this case for whatever reason. I seriously hope not but I guess most of those 257 could end up being morbid souvenirs/memory jogs for searching victims on FB depending on what comes out post-trial/post-hummingbird
Sorry to hear you had a tough childhood, we will mother you here!Speaking of washing, has anyone else put trainers in the washing machine and they've been ok?
I'm pretty useless at housey stuff (I was always in and out of the children's home/abusive life at home) so any advice would be really helpful, plsI've looked on google but there's 503839383 different answers
![]()
The other five babies are simply not relevant to this trial. It’s not reasonable doubt to speculate on something that has not even been presented in court.It’s ok. At first I thought you were being patronising but I have been here and have looked at everything I can - and I’m just not entirely convinced.
Let’s hope we never see anything like this case again because the other 5 babies bother me. There simply isn’t a smoking gun here but a lot of circumstantial evidence, and as I said before, some of those babies collapsed when LL wasn’t on duty so it doesn’t suit to charge her for those cases because she'll be not guilty - which weakens the cases she is charged for.
Thought this was going in an entirely different direction…Oh I'm the queen of decluttering.
Get 3 boxes: Label them Keep, Throw, Charity. And then take one section at a time, even if that means one drawer or one cupboard. Don't try to do too much as it will be overwhelming. If you've not thought about or used something in 6 months then pass it on or whizz it. We keep and accumulate so much over the years and honestly, we don't need it. Also get rid of any repeated items....you're really don't need 7 tin openers
Get everyone involved because it feels so good afterwards.
If you've got a shredder make yourself a nice pile of unneeded paperwork and do it at night as you're sat comfortably watching TV or rip it up and put it into a bowl of warm water, let it soak and when it's maliable squeeze all the water out. It will eventually harden and whatever was typed/written on it will be gone.
I'm a big fan of containers, particularly in the shed. I decant any paint leftovers into a jar and label which room they're from. I have containers for garden items, paintbrushes, screws, nails etc all labelled and stacked neatly.