What’s strange is the itv reporter said she was there today. But hasn’t done a report. Not really doing her job thereIt’s really gone quiet hasn’t it. I know it’s expensive to assign a journo all day but surely between them all taking turns as it were, one would be there on any given day so there’d be something.
In WhatsApp messages read to the court, Ms Letby asked a colleague on the afternoon of 14 October if Child I was staying on the unit.Baby had unusual skin mottling, Letby trial hears - BBC News
Nurse Lucy Letby is accused of murdering the premature baby girl after three earlier attempts.www.bbc.co.uk
BBC from today.
Yes, I thought so. OK, you could ask to be allocated the same baby, for various reasons, but her colleague’s reply is very vague and sounds like an excuse rather than a reason. The colleague replied obviously after having spoken to another staff member.In WhatsApp messages read to the court, Ms Letby asked a colleague on the afternoon of 14 October if Child I was staying on the unit.
She added: "I'd like to keep her please."
Her colleague, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, replied: "Yes. Staying for now. OK re keeping."
An hour later the colleague messaged: "I've had to re-allocate. Sorry."
Ms Letby said: "Has something happened?"
The colleague replied: "No. Was just asked to reallocate so no one has her for more than one night at a time. Or one shift. Not just night."
Ms Letby responded: "Yeah that's understandable."
Fuck me, that’s sinister.
Reply is telling too. Asked to do it, quickly clarifying that not just LL...In WhatsApp messages read to the court, Ms Letby asked a colleague on the afternoon of 14 October if Child I was staying on the unit.
She added: "I'd like to keep her please."
Her colleague, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, replied: "Yes. Staying for now. OK re keeping."
An hour later the colleague messaged: "I've had to re-allocate. Sorry."
Ms Letby said: "Has something happened?"
The colleague replied: "No. Was just asked to reallocate so no one has her for more than one night at a time. Or one shift. Not just night."
Ms Letby responded: "Yeah that's understandable."
Fuck me, that’s sinister.
I wonder if this was because someone was beginning to have suspicions either about LL directly or that someone was deliberately harming babies, trying to make sure the babies were not with one nurse more than one shift at a time.In WhatsApp messages read to the court, Ms Letby asked a colleague on the afternoon of 14 October if Child I was staying on the unit.
She added: "I'd like to keep her please."
Her colleague, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, replied: "Yes. Staying for now. OK re keeping."
An hour later the colleague messaged: "I've had to re-allocate. Sorry."
Ms Letby said: "Has something happened?"
The colleague replied: "No. Was just asked to reallocate so no one has her for more than one night at a time. Or one shift. Not just night."
Ms Letby responded: "Yeah that's understandable."
Fuck me, that’s sinister.
Exactly if colleagues had begun to get suspicious surely she would have picked up on that and thought to herself she should take a step back ? But nothing Lucy Letby does makes sense to me in this case why did she initial so many of the forms did she really think she wouldn’t get caught out ?I wonder if this was because someone was beginning to have suspicions either about LL directly or that someone was deliberately harming babies, trying to make sure the babies were not with one nurse more than one shift at a time.
Her response has something happened, I bet she was beginning to fear she was being found out…
Also I would like to keep her, to me that’s weird too If I was having the shit luck she was supposed to be having I would want the babies that were most stable !
Bloody hell that’s insane almost like the staff know something is dodgy so making sure only one staff a night instead of the same staff … she’s definitely guilty . I’ve worked in a hospital for eight years and I’ve never been bothered about what patient I’m helping .In WhatsApp messages read to the court, Ms Letby asked a colleague on the afternoon of 14 October if Child I was staying on the unit.
She added: "I'd like to keep her please."
Her colleague, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, replied: "Yes. Staying for now. OK re keeping."
An hour later the colleague messaged: "I've had to re-allocate. Sorry."
Ms Letby said: "Has something happened?"
The colleague replied: "No. Was just asked to reallocate so no one has her for more than one night at a time. Or one shift. Not just night."
Ms Letby responded: "Yeah that's understandable."
Fuck me, that’s sinister.
Exactly what I thought. It comes across as if they wanted to keep tabs on what was happening to the baby with regard to who the designated nurse was at the time.I wonder if this was because someone was beginning to have suspicions either about LL directly or that someone was deliberately harming babies, trying to make sure the babies were not with one nurse more than one shift at a time.
Her response has something happened, I bet she was beginning to fear she was being found out…
Also I would like to keep her, to me that’s weird too If I was having the shit luck she was supposed to be having I would want the babies that were most stable !
@raspberryjuice, must be a working day for you!Live coverage today!
Recap: Lucy Letby trial, Thursday, February 2
The trial of Lucy Letby, who denies murdering seven babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital neonatal unit and attempting to murder 10 more, is…www.chesterstandard.co.uk
They've gone into more detail in Court about the card she sent and photographed all very strange and also the Facebook searches to different babies one after another again makes uncomfortable reading.@raspberryjuice, must be a working day for you!
---
“I’d like to keep her please” Course you would Lucy, you’d set your sights on this baby to be the next intended victim.
It’s clarification that she did also have a picture of the front and the inside of the card with her hand writingThey've gone into more detail in Court about the card she sent and photographed all very strange and also the Facebook searches to different babies one after another again makes uncomfortable reading.
It’s clarification that she did also have a picture of the front and the inside of the card with her hand writing
I do think she is guilty all the searches so close together are not right 3 family in minuetsIt’s clarification that she did also have a picture of the front and the inside of the card with her hand writing
---
View attachment 1929812
can you let me know his Twitter handle please xxDan is also tweeting by the way. Strange detail about her gossiping about the parents coming to the door in underwear?! She’s something else
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?