I’ve added an extra option on the poll as we’re moving through the charges and I know some people have strong views about particular cases.
I also read that article as NG@Haveyouanywool yeah I get that, I wasn't meaning as much that I think the facts point a certain way, more the style of the reporting if that makes sense? It felt like the writer was NG.
Funnily enough I had been leaning more towards guilty before the break and since then feel like everything I've read is more NG, whereas when I was unsure, the evidence towards G was much more compelling.
If im making no sense its because I'm tired
Kind of@Haveyouanywool yeah I get that, I wasn't meaning as much that I think the facts point a certain way, more the style of the reporting if that makes sense? It felt like the writer was NG.
Funnily enough I had been leaning more towards guilty before the break and since then feel like everything I've read is more NG, whereas when I was unsure, the evidence towards G was much more compelling.
If im making no sense its because I'm tired
As Baby H had extra interventions of chest drains for pneumothorax, and required an ET tube for invasive ventilation, I think these would be very easy to sabotage.
thanks for that info, tbh I think all I have saw about H is one write up which I personally think has been written as though someone who think NG. I must say I have doubt on H but I really cannot explain a way of her being innocent for the rest so if I had to make the decision right now I thimk I’d have to go guilty. Seems to be a lot of things gone wrong for H though which hopefully the family can get answers for.Kind of
The headline was certainly more NG, I thought.
I’ve been wondering if there is less reporting as the comment sections have been turned off, for obvious reasons, and often these engender more, revenue generating, interest than the actual articles.
---
As Baby H had extra interventions of chest drains for pneumothorax, and required an ET tube for invasive ventilation, I think these would be very easy to sabotage.
I hope it has been emphasised in court that, nowadays, chest drains are uncommon for neonates and 3 being required is very, very unusual.
There has hardly been any mention of the mottling her father noted and that Baby H’s fingers on her right hand and a patch on her abdomen were white. There were also pink tinged secretions round her mouth.
It's like she doesn't remember a single search and the times of the searches are at very strange times and one after another with all babies connected to these charges within minutes a lot of the time. It makes you wonder what she was hoping to see. The live Chester Standard reporting today described a lot of normal sounding phone calls and texts such as to her mum about Christmas but then her Facebook searches were revealed by the police analyst which appeared sinister. It seems her life completely revolved around the hospital and whilst it could seem dedicated it could also indicate she had to remain involved all the time to know what was happening to the babies she was harming. I previously worked for a bank and we had a member of staff who was stealing money on quite a large scale. She didn't dare take holidays as she constantly had to cover her tracks. She eventually was found, tried and sent to prison.
Ouch, that headline definitely sits in the G campChester write up.
'Smiling' Lucy Letby offered to take photos of dead baby for parents
“SMILING” nurse Lucy Letby offered to take photographs of a baby girl soon after she had murdered her at the fourth attempt, a court has heard.www.chesterstandard.co.uk
is the person who writ this in court most days?Chester write up.
'Smiling' Lucy Letby offered to take photos of dead baby for parents
“SMILING” nurse Lucy Letby offered to take photographs of a baby girl soon after she had murdered her at the fourth attempt, a court has heard.
Yeah it's the one who often does the live reporting.
His headline comes across as someone who thinks guilty. I wonder if he staying impartial or does have a slight unintentional inclination of guilt after actually being there in the court
It's unusual to send a sympathy card from nurse to patient and I think she said it was the only one she ever sent but then to take a photo of the sympathy card and to keep on her phone is definitely very strange.
Yep. And then look through the wiki, back at all the similarities and indeed forward too. The air by babies spines. The baby is blown up like a balloon. The feed time and what was aspirated do not add up. I’m sorry but the baby was looking around the room, mum could sit her up, she was smiling and having bottle feeds. You have to at least accept to go from that to dying of “extreme prematurity” after so long doing well, is at best an incredibly unlikely and unusual trajectory. Again. This is another baby that was going to live.
Yes I’ve heard people say perhaps she sent it to someone to check wording but presumably they’d have a record of that if she had ever sent it. Trophy. Same as the paperwork.
I'd never do it. It feels weird and invasive - maybe one from the ward, but not from me. Especially since Mum says she didn't have much to do with LL.
I guess she could have taken the picture and then showed someone it on her phone rather than sending it? If that's what she's saying she did.
