I fully appreciate that not everyone has seen enough to persuade them yet, some maybe never will. I guess we all interpret so much so differently. I also think that it’s hard to come to some conclusions when you’re not actually in court, seeing and hearing everything that the jury do. But I think it’s interesting to hear what people think about certain things and why. None of us know what really happened, so none of us can be right or wrong, it’s just our thoughts and why really. I guess we all have very different personalities and experiences so view things differently even tho we all hear more or less the same thingI have understood your point, I'm just not convinced totally about the details or components of these patterns. It's not that people misunderstand, it's that they don't agree or it's not (yet) persuasive enough to change to guilty, or it can be excluded from the pattern.